A first for me - Show Grading - Guess the grade part 2 of 5

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by ddddd, May 3, 2022.

  1. ddddd

    ddddd Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest

    to hide this ad.
  3. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    ddddd likes this.

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    65 before, 65+ after.
  5. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I’m guessing the true view makes the marks look worse. I’m saying a color bump to 66
    Morgandude11, spirityoda and ddddd like this.
  6. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Wouldn't that be an end of roll toner?
    The different reads between the photos is making me guess that they only gave it a 64.
    It really depends on how flashy the contact on the cheek is?
    ddddd likes this.
  7. Abramthegreat

    Abramthegreat Well-Known Member

    I would guess 66?
    ddddd likes this.
  8. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    65 originally. 66 after resubmission. Really beautiful obverse toning.
    ddddd likes this.
  9. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    I'm assuming you thought it was an upgrade so....64 to 65
    ddddd likes this.
  10. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    64 to 64?? Just a wild guess.:rolleyes:
    ddddd likes this.
  11. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    MS 65 to MS 65+
    ddddd likes this.
  12. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Active Member


    OBV MS62*
    REV MS64

    Original holder probably a MS63
    ddddd likes this.
  13. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    This one was a 65 and remained 65. I thought it could have added a plus (due to nice color and good luster) but this one was more of an add-on to get to the five coin minimum and to have a TrueView (I don't always like TrueViews but it helps the marketability if selling).

  14. ddddd

    ddddd Member

  15. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Well I was a grade low, PCGS must have liked the color enough to give it a gem grade. Or, the toning is covering some of it.
  16. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    So you're 0 for 2.
  17. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    If you are talking to me. Yeah. in my defence contact like what is on Washingtons cheek should not be allowed on a gem grade coin.
  18. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    No I'm referring to the results of the two posts so far, zero changes in grade. I'm also 0 for 2 guessing.
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  19. Jim Dale

    Jim Dale Well-Known Member

    I love coins that look like they just came from the Mint. I am not a fan of the "coloring" that is on the coin. I have about 20 or more with small amounts of "color) the near the edge of my Morgans. Other than that, the coins that you showed us is pretty neat.
  20. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Dang, I missed this one. I will get in on your number 3 though. Nice Washington!

    Edit, I would have been at 64 for the surfaces, I think they gave it the ole' color bump to 65.
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  21. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I think it's a gem as the surfaces are on par with other 65s I've seen. The luster really solidifies the gem status. If it was a 65+ or 66, then I'd say a color bump was given.
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page