1992 error???

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

We're never going to tell on those pictures.

 

It appears NGC said it’s not an error. I would go with that.

 

I don't know that they'll match up the reverses, Sully. They don't get paid enough for that, lol.

 

The thread seems to be asking if it’s an error going from the title, for which I say they should look at the label NGC sent them. Also how much do they get paid? My grading fees better be going somewhere!

 

Trust me, it's not chump change. It's a racket, my friend.

 

Why can't I vote "no"?

 

It's not a 1992 CAM, if that's what you're asking. I've never heard of 1992 Lincoln Cent minted with a 1988 reverse die. Can you site your source for such a coin?

I agree with NGC. Your coin is not an error. It's a normal coin and I think NGC was a little generous with the grade. Just my opinion

 

Thanks your opinions are worth Gold NGC said they didn't recognize it I thought it might be unattributed

 

Was this entire thread INTENDED to confuse the bejabbers out of me, or is that just a bonus? My first, last, and only reaction to this thread is "whuuuuuut?" What sort of error were you looking for?

 

Kurt, your error in judgement!!! Stop clicking on these threads!

 

I feel so dirty and cheap. I forgot that the whole hobby is now upside-down. It's now "send stuff in for certification BEFORE learning anything about coins."

Did I get it right?

Maybe skip the whole thing and move directly to inviting Heritage to send a rep to your home and put together a name catalog sale for your road rash coins?

 

Step 1: Find Junk
Step 2: Send for certification
Step 3: ???
Step 4: Profit

 

You really should start a YouTube channel, you know?

 

Recognize what? die deterioration, Md, abraded die?
I think I am more confused than Kurt.

 

Not likely. I presume he told NGC what kind of error he thought it was, but I won't bet on it.

 

What a waste of money.
With all the resources out there today. Folks choose the least credible, and wonder why?

 

So now people are trying to tell the TPGs what they should be grading the coin as, in this case an error of dies used ?

maybe need to reference the YouTube video this was gleened from to the TPG?

 

My apologies for what may seem to be overly harsh posts by the others, but please understand that most of them spend their days trying to educate others. This considered, it's easy to become frustrated when seeing the very type of thing they're trying to get others to avoid.

That said, I still think it would be helpful for you to explain exactly what type of error or variety you believed the coin to be. Also, why did you come to believe it may be such? Unfortunately, there's a lot of crap info out there, particularly on garbage sites such as YouTube, so perhaps we can help send you in the right direction and/or avoid making the same mistake in the future.

Sorry this isn't under better circumstances, but welcome to the forum, sir.

 

I did some checking and there is such a thing as a 1992 "Reverse of '93" also known as a Close AM. It's an ULTRA-rarity.

Anyone could look at this for half a second and see it's not one of those.