1962-D Nickel Weak?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by AWORDCREATED, May 29, 2013.

  1. AWORDCREATED

    AWORDCREATED Hardly Noticeable

    Weak strike or some sort of double - everything seems to tail off into the field, and there is extra stuff under the date mostly sticking out the NE of it (if the date was Horizontal) Rev has the similar fillets
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Looks like a coin that was struck by a die later in its life. Seems especially common on nickels. Completely normal from what I can see.
    Keep up the hunt!
     
  4. 1amthe1

    1amthe1 Country Boy

    All three of those pictures were posted good, but you only need one of each side heads or tails upright. We can look all over the cent when you post like these.
     
  5. AWORDCREATED

    AWORDCREATED Hardly Noticeable

    Are you saying you suspect someone tampered with the coin, besides relatively normal wear? How do you think the extra metal near these highlighted areas got there? I am a noob, but to me it looks like either a light strike that didn't take the features down to the field and flatten the field completely, or it was hit at least a second time, that strike not being hard enough so it smooshed what was under. Either that or the die is that way somehow. What is that error called?
     

    Attached Files:

  6. AWORDCREATED

    AWORDCREATED Hardly Noticeable

    To me the various rotations on the scanner bed highlight different areas better, you can see better different things from the different directions the scanner illuminates from, don't you agree? My goal is to represent to you what I see.
     
  7. 1amthe1

    1amthe1 Country Boy

    A good trick to do if using a flatbed scanner, is to place the cent directly on the glass and then lay a dark piece of paper on top of it before shutting the lid. That helps with the glare and helps enhance the features. The lid of my scanner seems to cause reflections and glare otherwise.
     
  8. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    I'm not suggesting that it was tampered with outside the mint. I am also not saying it is an error. It is a product of a later-stage die strike...a completely natural process. The coin is normal.
     
  9. AWORDCREATED

    AWORDCREATED Hardly Noticeable

    Is that code for old worn die?
     
  10. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Yes, the coin was struck by an old, worn die.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page