They are all amazing,but the Washgton Quarter #1 is beyond exceptional.
MS 64 not FBL. Agree that it is very lustrous, but just misses 65 due to too many dings.
These pictures are much better than the original ones you posted. I can see 63 PL from this set of photos, not the others.
MS 62
AU details. Harshly cleaned.
Nice coin. High grade MS.
Pretty good price for an obvious counterfeit.
Wow, a true bargain! It isn’t even a decent fake. Beijing must be off of its game.
This is a huge positive, as GC has had some fabulous high end coins, where the images did them absolutely no justice. In addition, coins that...
Absolutely is full steps, unless you work for NGC.
It is a problem coin, for sure. At that price, there are no bargains. Given conditional rarities for 83s, 84s, and 85s, expect to pay a high...
That coin is no great coup. The photos are incredibly juiced. Based on my experience, and certainly not the photography, that coin is not one...
It is an average looking counterfeit. I saw one of the 5 on display in a Las Vegas show. This looks nothing like that one did.
Nice coin. I give it a 63. Good strong luster, with the usual Morgan bag marks on the obverse.
Nope. The 1921 Morgans are still the stepchild of the Morgan Series. A lot of collectors don’t like the design, compared to the earlier ones....
MS 67. The toning gives it the bump. Love the pastel reverse toning.
It has definitely been cleaned. As to whether or not you wish to buy it, that is your choice.
It is a supply and demand issue. The Denver issues were more problematic than the others. There are an artificially created demand for MS 70...
I agree. The third one definitely looks cleaned, but not the first two.
63 61 UNC details. 58
Separate names with a comma.
