Thanks all. Ed
Thanks All - I believe Markus 1959, worn die. Ed
If it is - would that be a planchet error?
I added 2 more images Chris - the best I can do. THX Ed
I have seen coins with a little of this but not this much - what do ya think it is? THX Ed
Just wondering if the Mint Mark D took a hit or was it something else. THX Ed
Thanks all - thought maybe post mint damage. Ed
Just found this and was wondering if this happened at the mint or not and how it happened. Ed[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I believe this is only Die Scratches and Die Chips - anyone disagree??[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Thanks all
Thanks all - my eyes are failing and I thought maybe MD. What grade would you say - EF??
I need another set of eyes - machine doubling or just nothing?????[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
I am in the process of getting the coin documented with the help of Ole Sjoelund from France on the Numista site. I am having problem uploading...
1916 10 centimes has the dot varieties but not the 1917 25 centimes also I believe this is the only RPD for this series. The weight is suppose to...
Thanks - just was not sure. Nose and eyebrow was just a marker from another variety. Ed
I am not sure this is MD because the nose (Die Chip) and eyebrow (Die break on eyebrow above back of eye). Also the #1 in 1953 seems to be closer...
Great Communications and a Great Site you run indeed. Ed
Thanks Treashunt
I thought it was close but was not sure. Close but no cigar. Thanks jallengomez
Need help – not sure THX Ed “Extremely strong Class VI extra thickness shows on the date, LIBERTY, and IGWT. The strongest spread shows on the...
Separate names with a comma.