ill say 63 but looks like the slab has alot of scratches and is hard to see what's actually on the coin
I am quite certain this would make 65 I think it needs to be re submitted :)
it is nicer than my small holder MS 64 for sure and not even close
Thanks i just got it to get the die breaks . I wonder how many are as nice as this one of this vam?
It is much cleaner than my 64+ and other 64 in hand not sure where it should be but I may send in for a regrade haha
It only graded MS64 I think it’s a solid 65 Plus maybe 66 very few marks
I wish I could take better pics some of the die cracks are spectacular
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] this came in the mail today , what I thought was a nice coin for the grade blew me away. I am so happy with...
I am quite happy with it . It was a tough find for me
I think it’s 64 and a pretty nice coin
I will when I can as well. Have a few nice clashed E ones
I am dreading the costs of the 1887 Vam B1 and 1889 cc vam 4A ( if I can ever find one )
keep searching the 91 o I have seen a few E clashed ones...
looks nicer than 61 to me too I think 62 +
thanks me too I am trying to get all the E clashed and partially E clashed Morgans I can find
I love those old ANACS holders
it just arrived and is hard to capture the coin with my camera phone. I am quite surprised in a good way. Has a lot more luster than I thought it...
PCGS AU-50 is what it graded at. I will get better pics once it arrives
Curious your thoughts on this E clasher. This was a tough one for me to find this nice . Not the best luster but I think its a nice example ....
Separate names with a comma.