That six pence is very pretty. I was going to go with a 4 because of some dullness on the obverse but since both sides toned nicely I'll give it a 5.
Is moon money the same as moon pies?
That's a different situation. Depending on the coin, it would probably be better to break it out and have it slabbed. A toned coin enthusiast...
That 1884 Morgan is a Heman Monster, er Munster. I'll give it a 5.
My car doesn't sing
Pretty clean coin. Since the toning breaks aren't physical nicks I'll go with a green bean.
I totally agree to leave it as is!
The pictures looked good after I found my pair of glasses; full of scotch.
Maybe one should start a glow in the dark toning thread.
Obviously, some mint employee was having fun with this. Since these sets are put together by hand it's hard to believe it was an accident. Too...
Go ahead, rub it in!
Ibid! The reverse is a solid 5 but nothing on the obverse. One really can't "net" toners so I'd give it a 4.
I agree with the 3. If it were more lustrous or rainbow I'd go higher.
I'm glad I'm late to this thread. I saw the nicks and scratches and would have gone MS62 but not details-damaged. I should start a thread called...
I agree that I would give it a high end 4.
I agree that I don't see any hint of Cameo in the OP coin from his pictures. Compare that to the graded example I showed. The reverse shows...
Thanks, please do! I hope you are right and they turn out to be nice coins. If so, it should give you some confidence in future dealings with...
I assume you are talking about the coin!
The pictures don't tell me enough about it. Here's a proof 1883 I just purchased to compare it with. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
If I could buy it for XF money then I'd take a chance on it. The poor imagery may hide a scratch or some other mark. I wouldn't pay the price of...
Separate names with a comma.
