I like the toning a little bit better on the 1878. I'll go with 4.4 on the 1882 and 4.9 on the 1878.
Here here!!
I'll give the 1884 a 2.5. I don't like the waffle texture.
I'll take it with a Scotch on the rocks with no grains of salt!
I guess that's always the thousand dollar question. Not everyone uses the same lighting when taking photos of coins. I try to take that into...
You can't compare the colors of the slab labels between the two coins. Your example uses an older monotone label while the other uses the current...
I love the vivid coloring; especially the cosmic blues! I'll give it a 6.
The colors are nice for a Roosevelt. My only issue is the splotchy color distribution. I'll give it a 4.4.
Proof 68. It looks better than this old 1955 relic.
Nice looking 1805. I'll say no bean to be consistent with a couple similar ones posted earlier that were rejected.
I'll give it a 5
Is there anything left of it to write about?
[ATTACH]
I need my eyes checked. At first glance I thought I read George Jetson.
Good to hear. You must still be buzzing from those 1833 dimes!
I built the walkway last spring to get to the lake across a flooded wetland on my property. The Great Blue Heron built a nest amongst the dead...
Pretty coin but I think the grade is generous after noticing the numerous nicks in the reverse field. I'll say no to the CAC since I think this...
I caught this on my swamp camera in north central Wisconsin.[ATTACH]
I've got a couple dryer dimes.
I love the reverse toning on the 1883-O; the obverse not so. Here's my dilemma. Should the obverse have more weight than the reverse? I realize...
Separate names with a comma.
