64
Return it. Harshly cleaned.
65 fbl
63 also.
63
I'm somewhere between 4 and 5. I'm leaning to 4.
These are a bit tricky. I'll guess 30.
Maybe @Insider will take a look. My opinion too is fake, and a contemporary counterfeit is quite likely. If so, it's a pretty cool item . Just...
The date looks really weird in my opinion.The 4 looks wrong and the 6 should have a knob on it, I believe.
Green on the bustie
I think just be happy with it. It's great to be aware of how other experienced collectors perceive our coins. But PCGS did straight grade it,...
The way I read the pics, the marks are pretty minor. We shall see. :)
Nice original skin. Not everyone's cup of tea, but nothing I see would bother me.
I better have another look. :) I still don't think it's less than a 65.
Nice one! 66
I dunno, man. I think either fake or messed with. But then these are out of my league, what do I know?
Hmm....Well I'm not convinced it's uncirculated, or even a 58. Guess I'll say AU55. I would be happy if my 1884S was this nice!
+1 I think it should be 63, but I think it has a nice enough look to get that CC benefit of the doubt.
If nominated, I shall decline.:p
When it's turning into a "pile-on", decent people need to quit. JMHO.
Separate names with a comma.