64
[ATTACH]
Didn't work for me but thanks, worth a try.
I can agree with your grade. But....possibly messed with at some point? Or at least hard usage.
I'd choose the top example, a coin with this much circulation needs some dirt and "circulation skin" on it. That being said, I've taken an...
I don't think this holder qualifies as "old", maybe someone can give the approximate grading date. The coin appears to have quite a few light...
1.9
I have a small bevy of raw ones. [ATTACH]
5.0 on each
I think there are lots of variables. But probably in general the "peace of mind" premium goes up as values go up. I'll throw out a thought of a...
After studying it I like it a bit more than my first impression. 3.6
Nice curve ball @ZoidMeister. I couldn't figure the obverse, but the reverse looked like a no question unc. Best not to give a coin the benefit of...
5.7 Edit: really I should have gone higher. Technically this one's a monster in my books...not the ultimate monster, but a monster. If that's...
I believe you can easily find a slabbed 65 of this date with more pizzazz than I'm seeing here.
As far as a grade, if the luster is there on the obverse like it shows on the reverse, I would think 63/64 range.
I agree, anything half decent is bringing $27+ on Ebay. I can't help with the vams, though as worn as these are I think it quite unlikely that...
Is the cheek scratch on the 2x2?
Strikes me her mouth looks strange.... Just a random comment, I never liked the 21's so I never look at them.
Yes really like both the second & third. Any proofs in there?
5.0
Separate names with a comma.
