You guys have me rethinking my number, but I was going to go 4.1. I'll admit, the obverse is slightly negative eye appeal to me.
SOLD [ATTACH] Asking $69.00. I always think this is a neat date. Prefer Paypal F&F but if that doesn't work for you we probably can work...
Other side?
Monster. A bit of blotchiness in areas, but I'm going 5.9
4.7
It happened to me once. It was a piece I really liked, and somewhat scarce, and I hadn't bought anything for a while, so I just left it and...
Very cool coin, but I question if the luster is there for a 66. I'll guess no bean.
Ike 2.4 Morgan 2.7
62
Nice and original, yet maybe a bit dark and not an overabundance of luster for the grade....my gut is saying no sticker.
They are all like that. It was common to use the Latin V instead of a U in the era these coins were designed.
I'll say 5.9
I think............3.1
3.9 on the quarter
[ATTACH] This should be a clue, right?
Green
I'll go with 58. Low MS would not surprise me.
64
A lot of collectors like toned Morgans. Provided of course that the toning is attractive. If you would like some opinions of your coins, post a...
Under magnification, the lines appear "bumpy", and I think, a bit raised. It appears they may be more raised on the higher relief areas of the...
Separate names with a comma.
