Yush! The penguins have waddled onto the thread!!! :hail:
The only way to know is to try. Get yourself a couple boxes lined up and start.
[ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Another proof. Much better struck than those 56s. [IMG]
What info are you looking for? I can tell you that the philly is not in fact a proof but an UNC. Large deate, the second pic is a 60-D Large date...
Complete my writings. Submit an article to the ANA in hopes for a scholarship. Complete my collection but we all know that ain't going to happen ;)
What contest sponsored by whom? Oh and congrats on the prize!
I can map dice!
Not too sure. For 56 I would think so because these are the only two I have.
Yay! Compare my above proof with this shown one. Still somewhat weak, but it looks better. [IMG]
Here's a (Very) weakly struck proof. [IMG]
Did it cost more than face?
My favorite damaged coin. [IMG]
Yes. Yes it is.
I was going to say I see no luster breaks. Have you tried to shoot the coin using axial lighting? Washington quarters shoot ugly with regular shots.
And thank you for not finding it absolutely tasteless and offensive ;)
I have many, MANY thanks to give. First I would love to thank my friend Raymond (Not on the forum) of whom I have met through coin dealing for...
I say 62.
A fight between A. Weinman and A. Weinman. Weinman gets my vote. [IMG]
Separate names with a comma.