These two steelies were included in a lot of Jefferson Nickels I purchased recently on eBay, gonna put them in my Lincoln album collection. [IMG]...
5.7, if it were a little cleaner, I'd give it monster status.
I'm at MS62, but the photos are pretty small and might be hiding some trace high point wear.
It most certainly is!
I always thought that white balance is related to the lights you are using, not what you are photographing. As long as you don't change your...
Way too much red in those TruViews. Do you think it is the white balance setting or something they are doing in post processing just to make the...
I still don’t get it.
??????!
That’s pretty egregious, but do you think that the small patch of charcoal toning should prevent the star on this Jefferson.
I barely noticed that dark area in hand, mostly because the obverse absolutely mesmerizes you. NGC’s policy of rejecting any coin with near...
Well being able to predict what grade the TPGs will assign is the whole trick. I look at it this way, if they are more than one grade away from...
MS66+*
I think there is virtually no chance that coin is AU. This is the reason I'm worried that it won't grade gem. [IMG] [IMG] They graded the coin...
Nice catch, FWIW, Bob's photos are better than Phil's anyway.
I can't see the doubling in your photos, but the die gouge from the R to T i LIBERTY seems to be a pretty good diagnostic. I don't know much...
2.8 This magenta/violet color scheme is pretty generic for 60’s LMC but that TruView makes the coin look great.
I find Washington Quarters one of the tougher series to photograph
I didn’t guess less than gem, but your photos seem to be hiding the luster which you say is very good. I think that is probably the reason for...
+1
The toning is nice but no way star worthy. The coin just doesn’t have the look of a premium gem unless the photos are hiding luster. I have it...
Separate names with a comma.
