a new addition auction description-- "Licinius I, with Licinius II as Caesar, Æ Nummus. Nicomedia, AD 320. DD NN IOVII LICINII INVICT AVG ET...
did you check Gallienus [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] Constantius Gallus A.D. 351- 354 22x23mm 4.9gm D N CONSTANTIVS IVN NOB C; bare-headed, draped and cuirassed bust right, A behind...
I wanted to fix my error it's Carthage 29a/31a that are almost impossible to tell apart and to introduce my new page on Carthage...
There is also a Nicomedia mintmark of SMNA. Cyzicus is the most common though. You should also post the obverse, since it helps (sometimes)
Some are probably like me and don't like large piles of coins for ID. These threads typically become confusing and cumbersome.
These coins celebrate the defeat of the Quinquegentiani (People of the Five Tribes), who were a confederation of Berbers in North Africa. They...
These coins were originally silvered, but sometimes even when the silvering has disappeared, still have a "silvery" appearance. Lots of factors...
it's a nice unofficial issue. I posted about it when it was sold a few years ago. The seller thought it was an official unpublished variant. the...
If you are lucky enough :D
[ATTACH] VANDALS Semi-autonomous coinage of Carthage. A.D. 480-533. Æ 21 Nummi (21x23mm 7.7g ). OBV: KART HAGO Soldier standing; REV: Horse’s...
[ATTACH] Decentius A.D. 350- 353 18mm 4.3gm D N DECENTI-VS NOB CAES; bare-headed & cuirassed bust right. SALVS DD NN AVG ET CAES; large...
It's from Lyons, your mintmark is PLG
there is no silvering....this coin has been untouched since Dattari owned it. There are merely highlights reflected,
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Constantine I AD 316 22x23mm 5.1gm CONSTANTINVS P F AVG; laureate, draped and cuirassed bust seen from the rear. MARTI...
it's a fairly common type...on eBay it might get around $20
here's an example like yours [ATTACH] Diocletian A.D. 296- 297 Æ fraction 21mm 3.2g IMP C C VAL DIOCLETIANVS P F AVG; radiate, draped &...
whatever it is, it not an authentic ancient coin as the new photos make it even more clear that it is very poorly cast
Carson, Hill and Kent in Late Roman Bronze Coinage have the GE issues from 337- 341
it looks like a Hadrian sestertius. The reverse reminds me of Virtus, though the pose does not seem quite right. compare with this example from...
Separate names with a comma.
