Wow, this is very close!
Shown below are two uncirculated 1955 Jefferson Nickels. Please vote in the attached poll indicating which coin your prefer and if you feel like...
Nobody is telling you not to enjoy the coin, but you seem rather new to this so we are trying to help you avoid the pitfalls that ensnare newer...
I'm at a 5.1. The toning breaks bother me a little, especially the area on the cap, and I don't really understand this toning pattern. The coin...
I am rating them subjectively. I’m not partial to blanket blue toning, and the unique toning on this coin with the elevation chromatics boosted...
You guys are gonna be surprised by this, but I actually prefer proof coins to be untoned and find toning like that to be distracting.
I'm going gold bean on this one as well.
I've looked, there is nothing special about that coin, and yeah, there are a few MS66s around. [IMG]
Here is an interesting question. Who submitted that coin for grading, and why?
That is a cool looking Morgan. I think by the scale it is probably a 3, but because of the unique nature of the toning, I give it a low 4.
Wow, Calfornia is tough in that grade. Very Nice!
This thread is an oldie but a goodie, should answer your question. Jefferson Nickels Reverse of 38 vs Reverse of 40
MS66, but is that PVC residue I see on the obverse below Jefferson's chin? The coin is very clean save the marks above Monticello and the 39-D is...
PR66, but grading proof coins from photos is a total crapshoot
This blue color scheme is not my favorite and as such, I will hold it at a 3.
Another Gold Bean
Gold Bean
4 Great color and coverage but appears to lack vibrancy. Heritage photos are notorious for muting luster so this might be a 5 in hand.
The PCGS Rattler holder provides more value than the NGC Star ever could.
They are tough on 1880-S Morgan Dollars MS65 PL
Separate names with a comma.
