Coin #1: MS66 There is a mark on the forehead that should preclude MS67 as they are very tough on grading this date. There looks to be a...
Ike: 2.5 Toning on proof coins tends to underwhelm in hand Morgan: 2.9 Needs more coverage to break into the threes.
I’m sorry but auction prices realized are not telling the same story. https://www.pcgs.com/auctionprices/details/1939-doubled-monticello-ms/84004
That’s tremendous, good luck with your submission to NGC.
You mentioned this in a thread yesterday, but I purchased my 1939 Jefferson Nickel DDR “Doubled Monticello” NGC MS65 in 2009 for $700. The...
I’m curious, how do the affected areas respond to secondary toning? Are they resistant? Do they tone more easily?
Green bean
Coin 1: 6 Coin 2: 6 I’m pretty sure we did coin 2 already, that’s the Sunnywood “Moose”
I was wrong, I had two 1973 Jeffs in my last submission. One graded MS66, the other MS66 5FS. I will post photos of both when I get them back...
There isn’t that much toning coverage but what toning is there is tremendous. I am also at 2.9.
MS64
Roller marks (planchet striations) can be different widths and depths dependent upon the foreign material stuck to the rollers. They can be well...
Has anyone had problems with sniping eBay auctions recently. I use gavelsnipe and it can't get by the "captcha" feature installed by eBay. As a...
Green
I’m not a big fan of secondary toning but this is better than most. 2.9
Golf balls
As previously stated, the coin looks to have great luster and eye appeal. The surfaces aren't MS65 but CC Morgans traditionally get a grade bump,...
I will give it a 1.5 because I like the pull away toning around the stars and date.
That 1964 is AT all day and PCGS should be embarrassed that they let that get through. That said, you guys have convinced me that the 1957 from...
Btw, here is that blue toned 1949-D I was referring to earlier in the thread. [img]
Separate names with a comma.
