Can you increase the size of the scans? Also, would you mind sharing how much you paid for these?
Nice specimen.
Congratulations on your win! :) It looks like you won an approx VG-8 specimen @ $19.51. Red Book lists that at $22.
Homer
I think Deb should bid on the item, win it, then use the opportunity to post feedback about the coin photo!!!
The internet is not a commune, it is not a love fest, it is not Woodstock. Photographs are intellectual property. Period.
I looked at the Heritage specimen. Again, I reiterate that this is out of my focal area. That said, I'm not sure I like the reverse dentils on...
That's something I couldn't even attempt to evaluate. These are not in my focal area. That said, I would hope this isn't the case.
Fret, it's a nice specimen, indeed. Could have very well been made prior to 1955... (anything beyond 19-teen-ish IMO qualifies as "modern" :) )
:thumb: Congrats Duke!!! Nice addition to your collection!!! :thumb: I wish I could help with the grade. I am equally eager to see how folks...
This would SIGNIFICANTLY angrify me BIG TIME if someone re-purposed one of my photos and posted it on ebay. I spent a lot of effort learning how...
Aside from the coloring on this specimen, which looks unnatural, is it me, or does the year on this specimen look suspect? The year does not look...
I concur. Photo programs can indeed be a bit daunting. PhotoShop isn't exactly the most user-friendly application. But once a bit of it's...
It's only a guess, based on the token's appearance, but I think this is a relatively recent/modern token.
I use PhotoShop, and in most cases for simple image combining, this is basically the way that I do it.
That 'No. 2' looks etched, not struck.
To each their own, I guess... Here is a thread about use of axial lighting on coppers that really is beautiful to me - "toning" or not......
finally! hopefully don't have to hear anymore about PhotoChuckit!
That is very schweet! wow!
I keep them all. I keep all coppers. I cash in the zincolns.
Separate names with a comma.
