GTG: 1889 $1 Gold

Last year of issue. Graded by PCGS.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

It's gotta be at least MS65. There are a few blemishes, but nothing terribly distracting. The luster is superb.

 

That and the $3 from 1889 are on my want list for the future.

 

65 & possibly a ++

 

Very pretty.

I do however see what looks like a couple luster breaks. Specifically a couple in the fields so I'm gonna be "that guy" and say AU58.

 

MS62. If I'm close I just got lucky.

I do think the relatively low mintages of these add to their appeal. On my bucket list.

 

MS64

 

I’m at MS-63.

 

MS63

 

I’ll give this one until this evening.

 

MS 61. A definite slider.

 

Nice pickup! Thinking MS-65

 

MS 62 or 63 is what I'm debating...I'll give it the benefit of doubt and say 63 (looks like nice enough luster to push it up to that level)

 

I'm going to say 64,love old gold.

 

looks like great luster, and decent strike . I think the obv. contact marks limit it to 64.

 

I think you’re spot on. Luster/strike is great but the surface preservation not good enough for a gem BU grade.

 

Here we go.......

 

Got it wrong again!