What do 1,200+ lbs of Lincoln cents look like?

When ever my wife complains about another coin
coming into the house, I show her the pics @lordmarcovan
provided in post #213 of this thread.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

#2 is rounded when it hits the field .
#3 has a shelve drop and then hits the field .

#3 doesn't have the clash either .

 

Did you see the photos of #2 presented by Lance Newman and #3 by Jason Cuvelier? Both show the clash, unless I'm looking at the wrong photos.

 

I seen the clash on both, but #3 doesn't list it in the listing .
#2 does ..

#2 doesn't talk about the shelve drop and then hits the field, which is how round the end of the cud is ..

Which really means #2 round, and #3 has a shelve drop on the end of the cud ..

 

My best guess is that I would say it is an 03 There is a slightly different rotation to the clash and what seems to be the shape of the smaller CUD.
Things might be easier with an in hand look.

 

Ah I just bought 26 pounds assorted coins but the med flat rate box was destroyed my weigh in 21 pounds Uggh !

 

Sorry to hear that. That’s why people should mummy wrap their boxes with strapping tape.

 

Here's one I found last night .
Wexler #4 .

 

Only got two shots, no date.

 

Ya .
I'm that good ..
Lol ...

 

I have another one to take a couple of images of .
It's a Copper one, I'll get full shots and what needed for the variety ..

 

Lol, I wouldn't put it past you

 

Three finds today. First one is a simple clash on the obverse. No clash showing on the reverse though. Thanks to @Shrews1994 for showing her clashes and making me more aware/alert for them.

 

Second coin might be PMD. I need some insight. @Fred Weinberg let me know if you need better photos. I see potentially three clips. Barely any Blakeslee effect, but the rim under a loupe is slightly larger/wider on the opposite side of the supposed clip than elsewhere.

 

Last one has me scratching my head. I believe it to be environmental damage on a 1979? D with a cud (couldn’t find the ref on cuds on coins, maybe wrong date?) and a retained lamination. @Fred Weinberg I could use help here too please!

 

Here's a coppercoins #1 .
http://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1982&die_id=1982p1do001&die_state=mds

 

The area on the date, looks like a retained lamination ..

 

Here's a rare die pair .

ODV-031
http://varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/Obverse Design Varieties.htm

MMS-009
http://varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/San Francisco Mintmark Styles.htm

 

Yes, sorry. Cud at the 12 o‘clock. Retained lamination makes the date unreadable. Can’t find a matching cud on the website.

 

I see you got to the S rolls