CoinTalk

Welcome to Coin Talk! Register Now, it's easy and FREE!

Thousands of coin collectors, numismatists, coin dealers, bullion investors, and enthusiasts make Coin Talk their number one source for numismatic news, information about US and world coins, discussions and community.

You are currently viewing Coin Talk as a guest, which limits your access to content, contests and information. By joining our free community, you will be able to join in discussions, contact other members, place free advertisements, enter contests, and much more. Registration is easy and free. Register Now


Go Back   CoinTalk > Coin Forums > US Coins Forum

Notices

US Coins Forum This forum dedicated to the discussion of United States Coins.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-07-2009, 12:07 AM   #1 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
Danr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,706
My Mood:
Question question for PCGS slab expert(s)

was there a time in 2005 when the satin mint sets first came out that the 2005 satin ms coins were not labeled "satin" on the (PCGS) slab? I ask because I saw a 2005 dime that looked satin but the PCGS slab did not indicate "satin."

Danr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-07-2009, 12:10 AM   #2 (permalink)
1909 Collector
 
illini420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calabasas, CA
Posts: 1,088
My Mood:
Not sure, but I know for a fact PCGS (and probably NGC too) sometimes slabs a satin coin in a regular holder by accident. It's not always easy to tell the satin vs. regular I guess, especailly in really high grades. Also, could just be an unfortunate labeling error.
__________________
My 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set
http://tinyurl.com/bbzy8y
My 1909 Mint Registry Set
http://tinyurl.com/dj7nbg
illini420 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 08:56 AM   #3 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
GDJMSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 23,503
It really doesn't have much to do with the slab. It has more to do with the coins themselves, epsecially those early ones.

There are a large number of the satin finish Mint Set coins that do not have a satin finish at all. Take the coin direct from a sealed box from the mint, and it sometimes could not be distinguished at all from a business strike. Yet, they were labeled as satin finish because they cam from the sealed box so there was no question.

But - break those same coins out of the sets and submit them, and they often came back labeled as business strikes.

It was and may still be, a quality issue, nothing more. The satin finish is due to die preparation and it soon wears off. Let the mint use the dies just a bit too long, and the satin finish is very faint or gone completely.

So it would be all too easy for the TPG to not identify a given coin as having the satin finish. But it would not be a mistake on their part. It is because there is no satin finish.

That said, yes labeling errors do happen. But for this particular case, it far more likely the former.
__________________
knowledge ..... share it
GDJMSP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 01:44 PM   #4 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,446
But in the future, if it become a common consideration that you have to have both business strike and satin finish to have a "complete" set, those non-satin mint set pieces are going to be commanding big money. Why? Because it is very hard to get top grade business strike coins. But since the mintset coins are struck at lower speeds and higher pressures they tend to come in much better condition. So it is MUCH easier to pass off a common non-satin mint set coin as a very rare high grade business strike. All you have to do is get it into a slab without the Satin Finish label.
__________________
Slab collector and researcher
reported as of 12/29/06
132 companies 332 production varieties
Conder101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 01:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 291
Reminds me of the time I submitted a South Dakota state quarter I received in change from the grocery store to PCGS. It was a nice clean coin, which I submitted in a small plastic baggie on which I put "circulation strike" with a magic marker. It cam back MS65 SATIN FINISH on the PCGS label! Go Figure...
kidkayt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Would you like to support CoinTalk?

Coin Talk Code of Honor
1. Post unto others as you would have them post unto you.
2. Keep it clean, like a 1950s family television show.
3. If you don't like the coin, don't trash the person.

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NGC Labeling Question CamaroDMD US Coins Forum 18 06-01-2009 09:17 AM
Broken Slab - I've been had! PeaceJoeMorgan Coin Chat 39 02-17-2009 11:17 PM
Toning in the slab - Coin Chemistry 900fine Coin Chat 15 12-21-2008 07:01 PM
Why Slab? davidh US Coins Forum 131 11-07-2008 09:58 PM
Question for eBay sellers re Slabs onlysdad US Coins Forum 25 01-31-2005 09:57 PM

» Newsletter
Sign up for CoinTalk's Newsletter
enter your email address below.
» Unanswered Posts
Do You Have the Answer?
» Sponsors

» Today's Top Posters
Top Posters in Last 1 Days
[22]
[21]
[16]
[16]
[14]
[14]
[13]
[13]
[13]
[12]

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 AM.


vBAdvertise v1.0.0 Copyright ©2009, PixelFX Studios
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright 2008 CoinTalk
"Wiki" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.0.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.