 |
09-29-2009, 10:14 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | PennyGirl
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 100
My Mood: | What in the WORLD do you call this? |
| |
09-29-2009, 10:19 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Coin Hoarder
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Knoxville
Posts: 1,266
| They can have both but this is mechanical/machine doubling
They can have both but this is mechanical/machine doubling. Always ask yourself "does the image look scooted, pushed or pulled"? If so 99.99% of the time it is just a machine doubled coin.
__________________ Benjamin Harrison Peters III Owner/Operator The Knoxville Coin Show Longest running Coin Show in the south now for over 27 years! |
| |
09-29-2009, 10:33 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | PennyGirl
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 100
My Mood: |
actually inhand it doesn't looked scooted, pushed or pulled. it looks "cut into". like someone took a sharp blade and cut into the tops of all the letters but just barely and the bottoms of the letters looks like someone was "trimming fat" off the bottom.. excuse the expressions i just don't know all the correct terms..
no-the-less odd. i searched all of Ken Potter's examples of Doublings and Damage to educate myself and NONE look like mine.
i also find it strange that Ken's picture of the 1960 Small Date over Large Date penny looks exactly like bad die deterioration damage to me (except for the RPM). hmmmm.. |
| |
09-29-2009, 10:45 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Coin Hoarder
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Knoxville
Posts: 1,266
| Even with a small date on top of a large date??? Quote:
Originally Posted by penidave actually inhand it doesn't looked scooted, pushed or pulled. it looks "cut into". like someone took a sharp blade and cut into the tops of all the letters but just barely and the bottoms of the letters looks like someone was "trimming fat" off the bottom.. excuse the expressions i just don't know all the correct terms..
no-the-less odd. i searched all of Ken Potter's examples of Doublings and Damage to educate myself and NONE look like mine.
i also find it strange that Ken's picture of the 1960 Small Date over Large Date penny looks exactly like bad die deterioration damage to me (except for the RPM). hmmmm..  | Even with a small date on top of a large date??? This type of doubling which is a class #3 design hub doubling is a perfect example of this type of doublED die - it looks different though than other forms of doubled dies.
No die deterioration at all.
You should be comparing your coin to class 1 or 2 type doubling.
Plus the reason you coin is not a doubled die is again because the doubling looks scooted, there are no splits in the serifs at all just movement.
__________________ Benjamin Harrison Peters III Owner/Operator The Knoxville Coin Show Longest running Coin Show in the south now for over 27 years! |
| |
09-29-2009, 11:11 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | PennyGirl
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 100
My Mood: | Quote:
Originally Posted by bhp3rd Even with a small date on top of a large date??? This type of doubling which is a class #3 design hub doubling is a perfect example of this type of doublED die - it looks different though than other forms of doubled dies.
No die deterioration at all.
You should be comparing your coin to class 1 or 2 type doubling.
Plus the reason you coin is not a doubled die is again because the doubling looks scooted, there are no splits in the serifs at all just movement. | NOOOO... i wasn't comparing my coin to Ken's coin at all! i'm simply confused b/c Ken's coin looks like DD "to me".. just trying to understand the different forms of doubling to educate myself.
here's a good pic of DD it looks almost the same (to me)... on Ken's pic the 9 looks scooted and the 0 looks shrunken "to me" (DD)... i'm not trying to debunk his coin i KNOW it's the real deal i'm just trying to understand what to look for b/c it confuses me.. i was just switching topics (sorry) i wasn't comparing the coins... sorry, again.. newbie mistake i guess. : ( |
| |
09-29-2009, 11:29 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Coin Hoarder
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Knoxville
Posts: 1,266
| No prob. I really want you to "get it" and you will, it's not an Quote:
Originally Posted by penidave NOOOO... i wasn't comparing my coin to Ken's coin at all! i'm simply confused b/c Ken's coin looks like DD "to me".. just trying to understand the different forms of doubling to educate myself.
here's a good pic of DD it looks almost the same (to me)... on Ken's pic the 9 looks scooted and the 0 looks shrunken "to me" (DD)... i'm not trying to debunk his coin i KNOW it's the real deal i'm just trying to understand what to look for b/c it confuses me.. i was just switching topics (sorry) i wasn't comparing the coins... sorry, again.. newbie mistake i guess. : (  | No prob. I really want you to "get it" and you will, it's not an easy thing to learn and learn well.
I think the reason Potter's coin looked that way to you is because the photo was taken straight on top looking directly down on it. To learn true die doubling you must learn to turn the coin, sometimes radically to get the light in on it and see "what your supposed to see".
It can be very hard to tell some.
Unlike your coin true doubled dies will not be directly on top of the coin. They will be juxtopositioned from them. In other words adjacent to be but slightly adjar from, (a letter or number not only on top but beside the primary, another image there.
These are my own ways of explaining it and are not official. But look at your coin again, is the secondary image you see a part of the original or truly another seperate image?? That's the key sort of like if you were somehow able to remove the machine doubling and nothing else on your coin would you still have a complete image of the letter? In other words your doubling is an extension of the primary and not a new and seperate device.
__________________ Benjamin Harrison Peters III Owner/Operator The Knoxville Coin Show Longest running Coin Show in the south now for over 27 years! |
| |
09-29-2009, 10:55 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Senior Errer Collecktor
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,497
My Mood: |
The photo of the 1960 D/D DDO shown is a LDS (stage 4) with the piece of broken die in the inside upper part of the "6". It is not found in the previous 3 stages, but it isn't deterioration doubling. And as Ben says, it is a different type of doubling.
Jim
|
| |
09-29-2009, 11:24 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Lincoln variety fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: New York
Posts: 437
|
Interpreting photographs of Doubled Dies and other forms of doubling is difficult. In hand, that 1960D sm/lg looks nothing like DDD.
When a coin is machine doubled, it cuts into the part of the design effected, thus the normal looking part of the design effected is smaller as the other area has been flattened. Conversely a doubled die adds to the size of the design.
The DC quarter shown, displays classic machine doubling. Keep searching and you'll find many, many more...
|
| |
09-29-2009, 11:30 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | PennyGirl
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 100
My Mood: |
[QUOTE=jcuve;699721]
When a coin is machine doubled, it cuts into the part of the design effected, thus the normal looking part of the design effected is smaller as the other area has been flattened. Conversely a doubled die adds to the size of the design.QUOTE]
now i get it.. wow, this entire time i thought when something looked "cut" into the design it could be a Doubled Die... i thought anything scooted, slid or shelf like was only damage...you really just helped me in a real big way.. |
| |
09-29-2009, 11:37 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | PennyGirl
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 100
My Mood: |
i am truly learning so much.. thanks for all your help bhp3rd and jcuve
now i'm going to go eat some breakfast before i start to look through the 300+ error coins i have hoarded up! lol... |
| |
09-29-2009, 11:50 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Just coins dealer
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: upstate NY
Posts: 1,313
My Mood: |
I think you coin has good pertential of being a doubled die i see notching on the A the left leg and right leg as well.This is not machine doubling no shelf like images ,and the images seem to be clear and rounded in some areas of the letters the images are not mushy. This could be a coin with some die deterioration doubling mixed in ,and a doubled die.
They can coexist on one coin I have seen it many times so just don't get rid of this coin yet. With DDD you have doubling on both sides of the coin in most cases as the pic that was posted .Your coin does not have those qualties. Try and give us different angles of the doubling before coming to a conclusion on this specimen.
I just want to make note with die deterioration doubling you would see an orange peel effect on the fields and yours doe's not have this another indication to know the die is worn.
Jazzcoins Joe
Last edited by just coins; 09-29-2009 at 12:08 PM.
|
| |
09-30-2009, 05:25 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Numismatist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,448
|
I also see what appears to be serif notching in the first two pictures. At the lower left foot of the A, and at the bottom of the MB.
Picture 3 is clearly machine doubling.
No opinion on pictures 4 & 5.
__________________
Slab collector and researcher
reported as of 12/29/06
132 companies 332 production varieties
|
| |
09-30-2009, 05:43 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Lincoln variety fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: New York
Posts: 437
|
I suppose it is possible those are notches on the lower left of the A & MB, but it could also be the way the light is hitting the coin. It is an uncharacteristic location for single squeeze doubling, but anything is possible. Maybe Penidave can take more pictures emphasizing that area so we can be sure...
|
| |
09-30-2009, 09:26 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Coin Collector
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,497
| Data- 1961 Half Dollar with doubled die rev in Coin Chat
Hello Penidave,
This post in the coin chat forum depicts a 1961 Half Dollar with doubled die reverse. http://www.cointalk.com/t71726/
It is a class V doubled die where the 2nd hubbing was pivoted.
If the link doesn't work, the post is currently in the Coin Chat part of CoinTalk.
Very best regards,
collect89
__________________ "All of us are smarter than any one of us" |
| |  | Would you like to support CoinTalk?
Coin Talk Code of Honor
1. Post unto others as you would have them post unto you.
2. Keep it clean, like a 1950s family television show.
3. If you don't like the coin, don't trash the person. | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Hybrid Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Newsletter | » Sponsors | | » Recent Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » Today's Top Posters | | Top Posters in Last 1 Days | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |