CoinTalk

Welcome to Coin Talk! Register Now, it's easy and FREE!

Thousands of coin collectors, numismatists, coin dealers, bullion investors, and enthusiasts make Coin Talk their number one source for numismatic news, information about US and world coins, discussions and community.

You are currently viewing Coin Talk as a guest, which limits your access to content, contests and information. By joining our free community, you will be able to join in discussions, contact other members, place free advertisements, enter contests, and much more. Registration is easy and free. Register Now


Go Back   CoinTalk > Coin Forums > Error Coins

Notices

Error Coins Discuss error coins at Cointalk.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-29-2009, 10:14 AM   #1 (permalink)
PennyGirl
 
penidave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 100
My Mood:
What in the WORLD do you call this?

2009 D District of Columbia Quarter...
is this a Doubled Die or some form of damage? it kind of looks like both to me... could a Doubled Die have Damage on it too? just asking..
(keeping my fingers crossed)




penidave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 10:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
Coin Hoarder
 
bhp3rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 1,266
They can have both but this is mechanical/machine doubling

They can have both but this is mechanical/machine doubling. Always ask yourself "does the image look scooted, pushed or pulled"? If so 99.99% of the time it is just a machine doubled coin.
__________________
Benjamin Harrison Peters III
Owner/Operator The Knoxville Coin Show
Longest running Coin Show in the south now for over 27 years!
bhp3rd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 10:33 AM   #3 (permalink)
PennyGirl
 
penidave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 100
My Mood:
actually inhand it doesn't looked scooted, pushed or pulled. it looks "cut into". like someone took a sharp blade and cut into the tops of all the letters but just barely and the bottoms of the letters looks like someone was "trimming fat" off the bottom.. excuse the expressions i just don't know all the correct terms..
no-the-less odd. i searched all of Ken Potter's examples of Doublings and Damage to educate myself and NONE look like mine.
i also find it strange that Ken's picture of the 1960 Small Date over Large Date penny looks exactly like bad die deterioration damage to me (except for the RPM). hmmmm..
penidave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 10:45 AM   #4 (permalink)
Coin Hoarder
 
bhp3rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 1,266
Even with a small date on top of a large date???

Quote:
Originally Posted by penidave View Post
actually inhand it doesn't looked scooted, pushed or pulled. it looks "cut into". like someone took a sharp blade and cut into the tops of all the letters but just barely and the bottoms of the letters looks like someone was "trimming fat" off the bottom.. excuse the expressions i just don't know all the correct terms..
no-the-less odd. i searched all of Ken Potter's examples of Doublings and Damage to educate myself and NONE look like mine.
i also find it strange that Ken's picture of the 1960 Small Date over Large Date penny looks exactly like bad die deterioration damage to me (except for the RPM). hmmmm..
Even with a small date on top of a large date??? This type of doubling which is a class #3 design hub doubling is a perfect example of this type of doublED die - it looks different though than other forms of doubled dies.
No die deterioration at all.
You should be comparing your coin to class 1 or 2 type doubling.
Plus the reason you coin is not a doubled die is again because the doubling looks scooted, there are no splits in the serifs at all just movement.
__________________
Benjamin Harrison Peters III
Owner/Operator The Knoxville Coin Show
Longest running Coin Show in the south now for over 27 years!
bhp3rd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 11:11 AM   #5 (permalink)
PennyGirl
 
penidave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 100
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhp3rd View Post
Even with a small date on top of a large date??? This type of doubling which is a class #3 design hub doubling is a perfect example of this type of doublED die - it looks different though than other forms of doubled dies.
No die deterioration at all.
You should be comparing your coin to class 1 or 2 type doubling.
Plus the reason you coin is not a doubled die is again because the doubling looks scooted, there are no splits in the serifs at all just movement.
NOOOO... i wasn't comparing my coin to Ken's coin at all! i'm simply confused b/c Ken's coin looks like DD "to me".. just trying to understand the different forms of doubling to educate myself.
here's a good pic of DD it looks almost the same (to me)... on Ken's pic the 9 looks scooted and the 0 looks shrunken "to me" (DD)... i'm not trying to debunk his coin i KNOW it's the real deal i'm just trying to understand what to look for b/c it confuses me.. i was just switching topics (sorry) i wasn't comparing the coins... sorry, again.. newbie mistake i guess. : (
penidave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 11:29 AM   #6 (permalink)
Coin Hoarder
 
bhp3rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 1,266
No prob. I really want you to "get it" and you will, it's not an

Quote:
Originally Posted by penidave View Post
NOOOO... i wasn't comparing my coin to Ken's coin at all! i'm simply confused b/c Ken's coin looks like DD "to me".. just trying to understand the different forms of doubling to educate myself.
here's a good pic of DD it looks almost the same (to me)... on Ken's pic the 9 looks scooted and the 0 looks shrunken "to me" (DD)... i'm not trying to debunk his coin i KNOW it's the real deal i'm just trying to understand what to look for b/c it confuses me.. i was just switching topics (sorry) i wasn't comparing the coins... sorry, again.. newbie mistake i guess. : (
No prob. I really want you to "get it" and you will, it's not an easy thing to learn and learn well.
I think the reason Potter's coin looked that way to you is because the photo was taken straight on top looking directly down on it. To learn true die doubling you must learn to turn the coin, sometimes radically to get the light in on it and see "what your supposed to see".
It can be very hard to tell some.
Unlike your coin true doubled dies will not be directly on top of the coin. They will be juxtopositioned from them. In other words adjacent to be but slightly adjar from, (a letter or number not only on top but beside the primary, another image there.
These are my own ways of explaining it and are not official. But look at your coin again, is the secondary image you see a part of the original or truly another seperate image?? That's the key sort of like if you were somehow able to remove the machine doubling and nothing else on your coin would you still have a complete image of the letter? In other words your doubling is an extension of the primary and not a new and seperate device.
__________________
Benjamin Harrison Peters III
Owner/Operator The Knoxville Coin Show
Longest running Coin Show in the south now for over 27 years!
bhp3rd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 10:55 AM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Errer Collecktor
 
desertgem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,497
My Mood:
The photo of the 1960 D/D DDO shown is a LDS (stage 4) with the piece of broken die in the inside upper part of the "6". It is not found in the previous 3 stages, but it isn't deterioration doubling. And as Ben says, it is a different type of doubling.

Jim
desertgem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 11:24 AM   #8 (permalink)
Lincoln variety fanatic
 
jcuve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 437
Interpreting photographs of Doubled Dies and other forms of doubling is difficult. In hand, that 1960D sm/lg looks nothing like DDD.

When a coin is machine doubled, it cuts into the part of the design effected, thus the normal looking part of the design effected is smaller as the other area has been flattened. Conversely a doubled die adds to the size of the design.

The DC quarter shown, displays classic machine doubling. Keep searching and you'll find many, many more...
__________________
JASON C.
CONECA & ANA - www.cuvelier.org
(all images I use are
©Jason Cuvelier 2008-09)
jcuve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 11:30 AM   #9 (permalink)
PennyGirl
 
penidave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 100
My Mood:
[QUOTE=jcuve;699721]
When a coin is machine doubled, it cuts into the part of the design effected, thus the normal looking part of the design effected is smaller as the other area has been flattened. Conversely a doubled die adds to the size of the design.QUOTE]

now i get it.. wow, this entire time i thought when something looked "cut" into the design it could be a Doubled Die... i thought anything scooted, slid or shelf like was only damage...you really just helped me in a real big way..
penidave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 11:37 AM   #10 (permalink)
PennyGirl
 
penidave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 100
My Mood:
i am truly learning so much.. thanks for all your help bhp3rd and jcuve
now i'm going to go eat some breakfast before i start to look through the 300+ error coins i have hoarded up! lol...
penidave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 11:50 AM   #11 (permalink)
Just coins dealer
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 1,313
My Mood:
I think you coin has good pertential of being a doubled die i see notching on the A the left leg and right leg as well.This is not machine doubling no shelf like images ,and the images seem to be clear and rounded in some areas of the letters the images are not mushy. This could be a coin with some die deterioration doubling mixed in ,and a doubled die.

They can coexist on one coin I have seen it many times so just don't get rid of this coin yet. With DDD you have doubling on both sides of the coin in most cases as the pic that was posted .Your coin does not have those qualties. Try and give us different angles of the doubling before coming to a conclusion on this specimen.
I just want to make note with die deterioration doubling you would see an orange peel effect on the fields and yours doe's not have this another indication to know the die is worn.
Jazzcoins Joe

Last edited by just coins; 09-29-2009 at 12:08 PM.
just coins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 05:25 PM   #12 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,448
I also see what appears to be serif notching in the first two pictures. At the lower left foot of the A, and at the bottom of the MB.

Picture 3 is clearly machine doubling.

No opinion on pictures 4 & 5.
__________________
Slab collector and researcher
reported as of 12/29/06
132 companies 332 production varieties
Conder101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 05:43 PM   #13 (permalink)
Lincoln variety fanatic
 
jcuve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 437
I suppose it is possible those are notches on the lower left of the A & MB, but it could also be the way the light is hitting the coin. It is an uncharacteristic location for single squeeze doubling, but anything is possible. Maybe Penidave can take more pictures emphasizing that area so we can be sure...
__________________
JASON C.
CONECA & ANA - www.cuvelier.org
(all images I use are
©Jason Cuvelier 2008-09)
jcuve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 09:26 PM   #14 (permalink)
Coin Collector
 
Collect89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,497
Data- 1961 Half Dollar with doubled die rev in Coin Chat

Hello Penidave,

This post in the coin chat forum depicts a 1961 Half Dollar with doubled die reverse. http://www.cointalk.com/t71726/

It is a class V doubled die where the 2nd hubbing was pivoted.

If the link doesn't work, the post is currently in the Coin Chat part of CoinTalk.

Very best regards,
collect89
__________________
"All of us are smarter than any one of us"
Collect89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Would you like to support CoinTalk?

Coin Talk Code of Honor
1. Post unto others as you would have them post unto you.
2. Keep it clean, like a 1950s family television show.
3. If you don't like the coin, don't trash the person.

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
World Coins -vs-US Coins Fool 4 Gold World & Ancient Coins 24 07-22-2007 10:39 PM
Buying World Coins in bulk Stephen2 Coin Chat 33 07-13-2007 12:19 PM
World coin/currency collectors JonySky World & Ancient Coins 17 01-10-2006 08:32 PM

» Newsletter
Sign up for CoinTalk's Newsletter
enter your email address below.
» Unanswered Posts
Do You Have the Answer?
» Sponsors

» Today's Top Posters
Top Posters in Last 1 Days
[38]
[25]
[25]
[21]
[19]
[17]
[15]
[13]
[12]
[12]

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 AM.


vBAdvertise v1.0.0 Copyright ©2009, PixelFX Studios
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright 2008 CoinTalk
"Wiki" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.0.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.