Quote:
Originally Posted by ejedi Welcome, the wild thing is I did not know 1909 had SOOO much going on.
Awesome set. |
Yeah, I think it's pretty funny when folks complain about the recent proof/mint sets having so many different coins!!!

Not all of the years back then had 30 different though (the 1933 Mint Set had only 5 and that includes the 1933 Double Eagle!!!!). 1909 is special though with the change in the cent design, the controversy over the V.D.B. on the new Lincoln and the final year of coins from the New Orleans Mint.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rzage Awesome set , I just love your 1909-S Barber Half , slab says 64 but it sure looks higher.
rzage |
Well before I sent it to PCGS it was in an NGC MS65 slab!!! I've shown it to a couple of Barber experts and they (as well as PCGS) didn't think it had the original luster to qualify for a higher grade. It has apparently been dipped in the past to likely remove unattractive toning and in the process the original luster appears to have been muted. To compare take a look at my 1909-O Half which is beaming with original luster!! So much so that I know that the previous two owners each submitted it to PCGS for upgrade to MS66 and both times PCGS declined to give it the bump. I agree that the 1909-O Half wouldn't look out of place in an MS66 holder though, especially since the New Orleans coins typically have weaker strikes and some believe they are graded differently than coins of other mints.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treashunt Also a great coin.
Trivia question:
Who discovered 1909 inverted S ?  |





I don't even have a guess at that one???
Thanks again for all of the nice comments and special thanks to all of you who have shared photos of your 1909 coins!! I love them all whether they are used and abused or whether they are mint fresh.
Good luck!!!!