 | |
07-09-2009, 10:48 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Numismatist In Training
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 188
My Mood: | I agree, this thread has gone way off topic; however, to keep in the spirit of the moment I have to add my two cents Personally, I will pay more for PCGS. Why? I don't really have a good reason. Perhaps I feel they are a little better, perhaps a little more consistent, most likely it is dain bramage though. I know there are other companies out there that do good work, and in some cases better work. But, I like PCGS so, I will pay more for their name. The question to me is how much more... the answer - not much! Now, certified coins in general: As long as it is a reputable company I will always pay more for a certified MS65 than I will what I think is a raw MS65. As good as I would like to think I am at grading, I am no pro. Further, when I look at a coin I am biased. I am looking at something I like - something I want. Therefore I am willing to pay for assurance from a third party that the coin is what I think it is - genuine and at or very near the grade I think it is. However, one must realize that a certified coin can be improperly graded/slabbed, etc… There are a ton of them out there. I think far too few people attempt to grade a coin themselves before purchasing a certified coin, and that is a mistake. I am willing to concede one or perhaps even two points - but, I have seen coins listed as AU that I would say are at best XF and the other way around. Those coins I will not buy unless the seller is willing to accept a reasonable price for the TRUE grade. Bottom line - you need to look at what you buy and make sure it is, to you, worth the agreed price. That price may be well over or under any price guide out there. Now, back to the original topic – there is no definitive guide for me. I consult my Redbook, Greysheet (or Bluesheet), Ebay (both current and completed listings), PCGS, ect… I look everywhere to see what the asking prices are and sales prices. Based off of a little research I can come to what I think is good price. This will let me know whether IMO I have a good deal or need to move on, and if dealing face-to-face with someone I have arguments to backup my offer. |
| |
07-09-2009, 11:00 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | 50 Years and Still At It
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,589
My Mood: | Quote:
Originally Posted by jmon I agree, this thread has gone way off topic; .... | No surprise.
Threads tend to have a life of their own.
Point them one way and they often wander off on a tangent.
But as someone noted above, the original question has been answered several times. Quote:
Originally Posted by jmon Personally, I will pay more for PCGS. Why? I don't really have a good reason. Perhaps I feel they are a little better, perhaps a little more consistent, most likely it is dain bramage though. I know there are other companies out there that do good work, and in some cases better work. But, I like PCGS so, I will pay more for their name. The question to me is how much more... the answer - not much! | An additional incentive for me to buy PCGS (or NGC) slabbed coins is that I have several NGC Registry Sets so I have to have coins from those two TPGs.
At least for the sets I put into the registry.
__________________ ANA Member APS Member ARA Member There are 10 types of people: those that understand binary, and those that don't. |
| |
07-06-2009, 07:49 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 107
|
In general PCGS graded coins do tend to get higher prices, or sell faster at the same price. That is the tendency, there are always exceptions. When I first joined the PCGS forum, I thought a lot like the others, that it was all Koolaid.
I learned that I was wrong, especially at higher prices, especially in some series. At $50 there is only minor separation between retail prices for each service. Go up to $500, and there are few ANACS coins. Go up to $5000, and there will be virtually none where the grade determines the price, or the coin will usually trade at a significant discount. The better coins will mostly have been crossed to NGC or PCGS. Keep in mind that the PCGS forum has a lot of heavy hitters, that routinely buy $5000 and even $50,000+ coins. It is a far different world than someone buying $20 to $100 coins.
Data in large numbers, doesn't lie. Data isn't koolaid. Any person can register at Heritage or Teletrade and look at thousands upon thousands of completed auctions. For some coins, some series, there is nary a difference. For other coins it is double or triple the price on average, for a PCGS top pop coin or high grade coin. For some series, such as Buffalo nickels or classic gold, there is often a full point separation for PCGS over some of the other companies.
|
| |
07-06-2009, 08:10 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Indian Buffalo Gatherer
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,338
My Mood: |
RedTiger, while I agree with you, I disagree as well.
If the buyer was expierenced, it shouldn't matter what plastic it is in.
If ANACS has the best coin, then buy that, then if he thinks it is worth crossing at PCGS, then by all means they can.
Me, I have PCGS on my quarter eagles for now, I have a PCGS registry set, and NGC registry set, what is good about NGC registry is that they accept PCGS coins.
Now I would have no problem buying a quarter eagle in a NGC slab, then crossing at PCGS if I thought it was worth it, because I decided a long time ago I wanted a PCGS registry set for my quarter eagles, and I want to stick towards that, so it is just easier for me to buy pre slabbed PCGS.
With somebody buying the 50,000 dollar coins though, they could buy a coin in a ANACS slab, and if they are not satisfied, they can shell out the fees to get it graded by PCGS
|
| |
07-06-2009, 10:12 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17
My Mood: |
If they have the "experience". Experience can be measure in dollars. I assure you it can. The higher a coin goes up in value, the less important my "expereince" becomes. I think just about everyone has a dollar amount to where they would feel more comfortable that the coin they were about to purchase was in the slab of a reputable TPG. It's nothing to be ashamed of. It's a second opinion. It's almost like an insurance policy. For me, I would not feel comfortable purchasing a coin that was priced at $10K or higher if it wasn't in a PCGS or NGC slab. On the flip side, make it a $100 coin and I'm very confident that my "expereince" would allow me to purchase a coin raw without much hesitation.
Does this make sense?
|
| |
07-07-2009, 12:44 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 107
| Quote:
Originally Posted by tmoneyeagles RedTiger, while I agree with you, I disagree as well.
If the buyer was expierenced, it shouldn't matter what plastic it is in.
If ANACS has the best coin, then buy that, then if he thinks it is worth crossing at PCGS, then by all means they can.
Me, I have PCGS on my quarter eagles for now, I have a PCGS registry set, and NGC registry set, what is good about NGC registry is that they accept PCGS coins.
Now I would have no problem buying a quarter eagle in a NGC slab, then crossing at PCGS if I thought it was worth it, because I decided a long time ago I wanted a PCGS registry set for my quarter eagles, and I want to stick towards that, so it is just easier for me to buy pre slabbed PCGS.
With somebody buying the 50,000 dollar coins though, they could buy a coin in a ANACS slab, and if they are not satisfied, they can shell out the fees to get it graded by PCGS | There are virtually zero ANACS coins at that $50k price level, or even the $2k price level where the grade determines the price. The owners don't submit them there because there are virtually zero buyers for ANACS holdered coins at the upper price levels. A few newbies might make the mistake of submitting, but they likely don't make it twice.
The market tends towards efficiency. If the ANACS coins would cross at the same grade and the auction results show higher prices for that grade for other holders, the coins get crossed or only submitted to certain companies.
The PCGS lesson is one that I learned the hard way, paying full price for ANACS and other holders before I knew better. Some readers will likely also learn it the hard way, thinking they are "educated" enough. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. A few readers might listen to and learn from, the more experienced, more knowledgeable people and pay a lot less tuition in the process. But hey, what do I know, I only have 30+ years in the hobby.
Last edited by RedTiger; 07-07-2009 at 12:47 AM.
|
| |
07-07-2009, 12:57 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | doggone it people like me
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,807
My Mood: | Quote:
Originally Posted by RedTiger There are virtually zero ANACS coins at that $50k price level, or even the $2k price level where the grade determines the price. The owners don't submit them there because there are virtually zero buyers for ANACS holdered coins at the upper price levels. A few newbies might make the mistake of submitting, but they likely don't make it twice. | Plus... not many newbies are holding $50k coins.
Though I'm willing to give it try ! |
| |
07-07-2009, 07:28 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Numismatist
Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: PA
Posts: 23,515
| Quote:
Originally Posted by RedTiger There are virtually zero ANACS coins at that $50k price level, or even the $2k price level where the grade determines the price. | Won't argue that. Of course there was a time when quite a few of those $2k to $50k coins were in ANACS, ICG and NGC holders. And that time can range from, oh, 20 years ago to last week. And of course let's not forget that when those coins were in those ANACS ( and I will specify that I am refering to the old ANACS & ICG) ICG and NGC holders, they were graded mostly the same, and often lower, than the grade on the PCGS holders they now reside in. Quote: |
The owners don't submit them there because there are virtually zero buyers for ANACS holdered coins at the upper price levels. A few newbies might make the mistake of submitting, but they likely don't make it twice.
| Hmmmmm - then I wonder who it was that submitted all those coins to ANACS, ICG and NGC ? For there have truly been thousands upon thousands of them. You suppose there are that many newbies out there buying coins for $50k ?
Do you suppose that if you go back and look at all of the great, and I mean great, collections of the past where the majority of the cataloged coins were originally in some other holder, besides PCGS, that those guys were newbies too ? Somehow, I don't think they were.
But what do I know, I've only been doing this for about 50 years now
__________________
knowledge ..... share it
|
| |
07-07-2009, 09:44 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 107
| Quote:
Originally Posted by GDJMSP Won't argue that. Of course there was a time when quite a few of those $2k to $50k coins were in ANACS, ICG and NGC holders. And that time can range from, oh, 20 years ago to last week. And of course let's not forget that when those coins were in those ANACS ( and I will specify that I am refering to the old ANACS & ICG) ICG and NGC holders, they were graded mostly the same, and often lower, than the grade on the PCGS holders they now reside in.
Hmmmmm - then I wonder who it was that submitted all those coins to ANACS, ICG and NGC ? For there have truly been thousands upon thousands of them. You suppose there are that many newbies out there buying coins for $50k ?
Do you suppose that if you go back and look at all of the great, and I mean great, collections of the past where the majority of the cataloged coins were originally in some other holder, besides PCGS, that those guys were newbies too ? Somehow, I don't think they were.
But what do I know, I've only been doing this for about 50 years now  | NGC, I'll grant you. NGC has greater market share than PCGS. The other companies not so much.
Again, for some coins the grade doesn't make the price, and those coins are okay to send into ANACS for authentication. For others, the grade and the holder both play a large role in market valuation. Whether I like it or you like it, data in large numbers provides solid evidence to that effect. I didn't set up the rules, I observe them, and play by them.
No one has to take my word for anything. I encourage all the readers to go look up the auction results at the major sites (Heritage, Teletrade, Ebay) for the coins they are interested in purchasing. For some series in some grades, there isn't much price difference between the major services and it is fine to shop around. For other coins there is a wide gap. For the series and grades where there are significant price differences (in extreme cases double or triple the price), about 80% of the time it is PCGS as the service with the higher average prices, 20% might be NGC.
There may be cases, but don't ever remember seeing a case where ANACS or ICG have higher average prices when there are lots of data points. Individual coins, yes, of course. A coin with spectacular toning or other remarkable factors may bring a much higher price than a coin in a top two holder. However, on average when there is lots of data, I've never seen a case where one of those other services have a much higher average price than the big two. It doesn't mean that coins in other holders aren't worth buying. No not at all, but the market valuation may not be the same as for a coin in a top two holder.
I'm not here to bash any company, or to fly the flag for any company, or to drink Koolaid or to sell Koolaid. There is no need to listen to me, or any other forum pundit, the data is out there for all to examine and reach their own conclusions. Again, I encourage everyone to do their own homework on the coins they are interested in and reach their own conclusions. Again, it will vary depending on series, grade, average price. In some cases there is no measurable difference at all and it is fine to shop around. In other cases there is a big price difference and a potential buyer best know that before spending their money.
|
| |
07-08-2009, 08:48 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Numismatist
Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: PA
Posts: 23,515
| Quote:
Originally Posted by RedTiger NGC, I'll grant you. NGC has greater market share than PCGS. The other companies not so much.
Again, for some coins the grade doesn't make the price, and those coins are okay to send into ANACS for authentication. For others, the grade and the holder both play a large role in market valuation. Whether I like it or you like it, data in large numbers provides solid evidence to that effect. I didn't set up the rules, I observe them, and play by them. .............. |
I readily admit that coins in PCGS slabs bring higher prices, and I have always admitted it. But you being new around here would not know that about me. I also know why they bring higher prices and I know that the price gap between a given coin in a PCGS slab or another TPG's slab has been steadily decreasing over the years.In today's world that gap is no where near what it used to be.
The entire point of my response to you was not about coins in a given slab bringing higher prices - it was ONLY to point out that not everyone submits high dollar coins to PCGS and only PCGS, which is what you were saying previously. It simply isn't true.
__________________
knowledge ..... share it
|
| |
07-06-2009, 10:23 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Indian Buffalo Gatherer
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,338
My Mood: |
Yes it does, I wouldn't spend $10,000 on some rare key date raw, due to the possibility of it being fake.
But I would definitely spend more muhla if it were PCGS/NGC as they are the most respected companies.
But all I was saying is, people think PCGS is the only way to go, when in fact on most coins you can't go wrong with PCGS/NGC.
Trust me, if it was a key date, I would buy the best coin I could afford, whether it be NGC, PCGS, ANACS. You never know, get an ANACS coin, for way cheaper, and cross at PCGS if you want...
|
| |
07-06-2009, 11:14 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17
My Mood: | Quote:
Originally Posted by tmoneyeagles You never know, get an ANACS coin, for way cheaper, and cross at PCGS if you want... | Maybe. You would hope. |
| |
07-07-2009, 09:23 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Coin Collector
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Eastern Iowa
Posts: 1,173
|
There's an interesting thread in the "What's it worth" section about an 1886-O Morgan that was purchased raw. After three pages of comments, the general conclusion is you basically CANNOT buy such a coin in MS state that isn't in a slab. If it isn't in a slab, there's probably something wrong with it or it's not MS (not my conclusion, but where the thread went).
A couple people hit it on the head - everyone has a threshold where you reach the limit of your confidence in grading and determining authenticity where you basically will "buy the slab". You're still buying the coin, of course, but it comes wrapped in a fizzy feel-good wrapper.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know what I want, but I know how to get it
|
| |
07-07-2009, 10:10 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | 50 Years and Still At It
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,589
My Mood: |
Slabs vary in significance depending upon what your collecting interest is.
Someone who collects IHCs can afford to spend the time researching and learning the specifics of the set.
Which years tend to have the best strikes.
What varieties are there.
They can read and study Snow's book cover to cover ... several times.
And any othe respected resources.
With that info and actually looking at many IHCs these people can pick out the PQ coins whether they are slabbed or not. BUT
Someone whose collecting objective is a type set (like me) doesn't have the time to do an intensive study of characteristics of an issue, never mind the 80 or 90 different issues they will be collecting.
We don't/can't spend a year studying each issue just to buy one coin.
Particularly if it's a hobby and not a profession (dealers).
These people learn general grading techniques such as breaks in luster.
These people learn to detect cleaned or altered coins.
These people learn general strike characteristics of each issue.
Then they depend on guides such as the ANA Grading Guide. AND
They depend upon the major TPGs to help them avoid fakes, counterfeits, etc.
They depend upon the major TPGs to help them grade.
Slabbed coins are of much greater significance to a type collector than an issue specialist.
I can safely say my collection wouldn't be anywhere near what it is today without slabs.
So I'm willing to fork over a bit more money to get a slabbed coin.
I use my skills to get close and then let the experts take me the rest of the way.
__________________ ANA Member APS Member ARA Member There are 10 types of people: those that understand binary, and those that don't.
Last edited by kanga; 07-07-2009 at 10:12 AM.
|
| |
07-07-2009, 01:57 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Indian Buffalo Gatherer
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,338
My Mood: | Quote:
Originally Posted by kanga Slabs vary in significance depending upon what your collecting interest is.
Someone who collects IHCs can afford to spend the time researching and learning the specifics of the set.
Which years tend to have the best strikes.
What varieties are there.
They can read and study Snow's book cover to cover ... several times.
And any othe respected resources.
With that info and actually looking at many IHCs these people can pick out the PQ coins whether they are slabbed or not. BUT
Someone whose collecting objective is a type set (like me) doesn't have the time to do an intensive study of characteristics of an issue, never mind the 80 or 90 different issues they will be collecting.
We don't/can't spend a year studying each issue just to buy one coin.
Particularly if it's a hobby and not a profession (dealers).
These people learn general grading techniques such as breaks in luster.
These people learn to detect cleaned or altered coins.
These people learn general strike characteristics of each issue.
Then they depend on guides such as the ANA Grading Guide. AND
They depend upon the major TPGs to help them avoid fakes, counterfeits, etc.
They depend upon the major TPGs to help them grade.
Slabbed coins are of much greater significance to a type collector than an issue specialist.
I can safely say my collection wouldn't be anywhere near what it is today without slabs.
So I'm willing to fork over a bit more money to get a slabbed coin.
I use my skills to get close and then let the experts take me the rest of the way. | Agreed, but Slabs are very important when it comes to any collecting, not just type sets. They can assist with the grade, and guarantee it is authentic, and if you know how to grade your coins properly, and you agree with the grade on the slab, there should be no problem with buying that coin in a slab whether it is PCGS, NGC, any other respectable TPG.
|
| |  | | Would you like to support CoinTalk?
Coin Talk Code of Honor
1. Post unto others as you would have them post unto you.
2. Keep it clean, like a 1950s family television show.
3. If you don't like the coin, don't trash the person. | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Hybrid Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Newsletter | » Sponsors | | » Recent Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » Today's Top Posters | | Top Posters in Last 1 Days | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |