CoinTalk

Welcome to Coin Talk! Register Now, it's easy and FREE!

Thousands of coin collectors, numismatists, coin dealers, bullion investors, and enthusiasts make Coin Talk their number one source for numismatic news, information about US and world coins, discussions and community.

You are currently viewing Coin Talk as a guest, which limits your access to content, contests and information. By joining our free community, you will be able to join in discussions, contact other members, place free advertisements, enter contests, and much more. Registration is easy and free. Register Now


Go Back   CoinTalk > Coin Forums > US Coins Forum

Notices

US Coins Forum This forum dedicated to the discussion of United States Coins.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-14-2009, 07:34 AM   #16 (permalink)
Coin Collector
 
coinman0456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 1,445
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to coinman0456
Well Done! Thank you.

__________________
coinman0456 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009, 02:13 PM   #17 (permalink)
Indian Buffalo Gatherer
 
tmoneyeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,342
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroDMD View Post
See, I don't think this is necessarily true. I would say O mint Morgan's were more frequently weakly struck than the other mints.
But if you got all of the morgan O minted dollars, ever minted (lets say none were ever melted, and you owned all the morgans ever) wouldn't you see that most are weakly struck? Yes you'd have a good number of however many million well struck examples, but I think you'd find more O's that are weakly struck.
__________________
From The Desk Of, -T$ (Kokapowan Tribe Leader)

http://www.tmoneyeagles.webs.com/
tmoneyeagles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 02:17 PM   #18 (permalink)
Dental Student
 
CamaroDMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,382
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmoneyeagles View Post
But if you got all of the morgan O minted dollars, ever minted (lets say none were ever melted, and you owned all the morgans ever) wouldn't you see that most are weakly struck? Yes you'd have a good number of however many million well struck examples, but I think you'd find more O's that are weakly struck.
No, I don't think you would. You would find that some of the dates have the majority weakly struck...but not most of the total coins. This is the misconception I'm trying to point out. I'll agree that quality control at the New Orleans mint wasn't as good as the others (for various reasons) and as a result a higher percentage of the total minted coins are weakly struck than other mints. Like many things, the O mint has a bad stigma that makes them appear worse than they actually are. There are several years that are quite well struck.
CamaroDMD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 02:20 PM   #19 (permalink)
Indian Buffalo Gatherer
 
tmoneyeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,342
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroDMD View Post
No, I don't think you would. You would find that some of the dates have the majority weakly struck...but not most of the total coins. This is the misconception I'm trying to point out. I'll agree that quality control at the New Orleans mint wasn't as good as the others (for various reasons) and as a result a higher percentage of the total minted coins are weakly struck than other mints. Like many things, the O mint has a bad stigma that makes them appear worse than they actually are. There are several years that are quite well struck.
But note, I'm not disagreeing with this either, YES, some dates are weakly struck, some are poorly struck, and some are intermediately struck
Look at the pics I brought forth on page 1, 83 and 84 O are what you called intermediate. My 1883 O is weakly struck, and my 1884 O is a very good strike, so I have an example of a good strike, and a weak strike, in the intermediate years.
If you look hard enough, you can find a well struck example of every year
__________________
From The Desk Of, -T$ (Kokapowan Tribe Leader)

http://www.tmoneyeagles.webs.com/
tmoneyeagles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 02:22 PM   #20 (permalink)
Morgans Morgans Morgans
 
raider34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 3,022
My Mood:
Send a message via AIM to raider34
Great info Camaro! Thanks for posting
raider34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 02:24 PM   #21 (permalink)
Dental Student
 
CamaroDMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,382
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmoneyeagles View Post
My 1883 O is weakly struck, and my 1884 O is a very good strike, so I have an example of a good strike, and a weak strike, in the intermediate years.
If you look hard enough, you can find a well struck example of every year
Yes, but I think you are misunderstanding what I meant when I classified a Intermediate Strike. I defined the classification criteria of each group. Here is a direct quote from my original post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroDMD View Post
The second group is Intermediately Struck. These tend to be years where there is a very wide strike quality out there. You can find examples of these coins with full strikes and completely flat. These are dates I would be looking for nicer struck coins because they are out there with a little searching.
I think you are proving my point about the "Intermediate" years without realizing it.
CamaroDMD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 02:27 PM   #22 (permalink)
Indian Buffalo Gatherer
 
tmoneyeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,342
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroDMD View Post
Yes, but I think you are misunderstanding what I meant when I classified a Intermediate Strike. I defined the classification criteria of each group. Here is a direct quote from my original post.


I think you are proving my point about the "Intermediate" years without realizing it.
No I understood it clearly, for those years it was either a hit or miss.
Some were fully struck, some were weakly struck
__________________
From The Desk Of, -T$ (Kokapowan Tribe Leader)

http://www.tmoneyeagles.webs.com/
tmoneyeagles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 02:28 PM   #23 (permalink)
Indian Buffalo Gatherer
 
tmoneyeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,342
My Mood:
I think what I meant by my statement, was that, out of those intermediate years, I proved that you can have well struck and poorly struck, thus confirming your oringal statement of a wide variety
__________________
From The Desk Of, -T$ (Kokapowan Tribe Leader)

http://www.tmoneyeagles.webs.com/
tmoneyeagles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 02:56 PM   #24 (permalink)
Dental Student
 
CamaroDMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,382
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmoneyeagles View Post
I think what I meant by my statement, was that, out of those intermediate years, I proved that you can have well struck and poorly struck, thus confirming your oringal statement of a wide variety
Then I think we are in agreement.
CamaroDMD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 03:17 PM   #25 (permalink)
Indian Buffalo Gatherer
 
tmoneyeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,342
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroDMD View Post
Then I think we are in agreement.
Camaro, that is a first! Should we throw a party? LOL!
Everybody, party at T$'s House, Camaro and T$ agreed on something!

LOL!!!!
__________________
From The Desk Of, -T$ (Kokapowan Tribe Leader)

http://www.tmoneyeagles.webs.com/
tmoneyeagles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 04:11 PM   #26 (permalink)
Member
 
WLhalves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 130
My Mood:
Thank you very informative always appreciate a well written thread.
WLhalves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 06:07 PM   #27 (permalink)
Indian Buffalo Gatherer
 
tmoneyeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,342
My Mood:
Just got another O minted dollar
I paid a couple cents under retail, for an 1885 O NGC MS63 a fwe minutes ago... And I'm excited...
I'll take good pics when they come in, and see if we have a full strike, or a weaker strike
__________________
From The Desk Of, -T$ (Kokapowan Tribe Leader)

http://www.tmoneyeagles.webs.com/
tmoneyeagles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 10:33 PM   #28 (permalink)
Indian Buffalo Gatherer
 
tmoneyeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,342
My Mood:
Okay I just bought another O minted morgan dollar, an 1898 O NGC MS64
This will be the first MS64 in my collection, I will take pics of this along with the 85 O and compare them to my 1883 and 1884 O morgans, and see which one of my intermediate struck morgans, has the best struck, and which has the worst.
__________________
From The Desk Of, -T$ (Kokapowan Tribe Leader)

http://www.tmoneyeagles.webs.com/
tmoneyeagles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 05:39 PM   #29 (permalink)
Indian Buffalo Gatherer
 
tmoneyeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,342
My Mood:
Okay camaro, I got another pretty well struck dollar, that is in the "intermediate" section...
I'm doing pretty good! LOL!
If that 1885 O I bought is another well struck one, I'll have 3 out of 4 well struck morgans in the intermediate years!

1898-o-ngc-ms64.jpg
__________________
From The Desk Of, -T$ (Kokapowan Tribe Leader)

http://www.tmoneyeagles.webs.com/
tmoneyeagles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2009, 06:36 PM   #30 (permalink)
Dental Student
 
CamaroDMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,382
My Mood:
That strike looks pretty nice to me.
CamaroDMD is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Would you like to support CoinTalk?

Coin Talk Code of Honor
1. Post unto others as you would have them post unto you.
2. Keep it clean, like a 1950s family television show.
3. If you don't like the coin, don't trash the person.

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TRIVIA: The 1878 Morgan Dollars Clinker Coin Chat 7 06-08-2009 11:18 AM
Fsh: Pcgs Ms-64 1797 Large Cent, Pcgs Xf-45 1818/5 Quarter & Much More Shortgapbob Open 0 09-10-2008 02:28 PM
Fsh: New Ana Purchases! Many Rarities & Registry Quality Coins! Shortgapbob Open 0 08-07-2008 02:52 PM
Is the government destroying Morgan Silver Dollars? TheOverman US Coins Forum 46 08-02-2007 11:50 PM
1881-S Morgan Dollars CamaroDMD US Coins Forum 4 07-05-2006 09:32 AM

You Rated this Thread:
» Newsletter
Sign up for CoinTalk's Newsletter
enter your email address below.
» Unanswered Posts
Do You Have the Answer?
» Sponsors

» Today's Top Posters
Top Posters in Last 1 Days
[28]
[25]
[21]
[19]
[17]
[12]
[11]
[11]
[10]
[10]

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM.


vBAdvertise v1.0.0 Copyright ©2009, PixelFX Studios
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright 2008 CoinTalk
"Wiki" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.0.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.