Counterfeits & ANACS

HandsomeToad · 03-26-2009, 06:23 PM

Howdy peeps,

ANACS has adopted a policy of not returning obvious counterfeits back to the submitter:

http://www.anacs.com/contentPages/CounterfeitCoins.aspx

The exception being if authenticity is questionable. I'm not sure when this policy became effective, since there is no date on the memo, but I just found out about it today so I figured some of you may not have known about it either?

I think this policy will help to stop counterfeits from being sold as authentic on Ebay, since the Secret Service will be requesting a full refund be given to the purchaser of the counterfeit item and the seller will be flagged in their system, which ain't a monkey anyone wants on their back.

Furthermore, I think the other reputable TPG's ought to follow suit.

Ribbit

**raider34** · 03-26-2009, 06:30 PM

I think that's a great idea

, Im sure it will still anger some people though.

**raider34** · 03-26-2009, 06:33 PM

I could just picture the lawsuits now. I sent them a 1893 S Morgan dollar in uncirculated condition, and they stole it and said it was counterfeit. I want $120,000 for the coin and 50,000 for my pain and suffering.

jloring · 03-26-2009, 06:33 PM

I like the last setence:

"The Secret Service’s ultimate goal is to trace the coin back to the original perpetrator."

Shouldn't be too hard to do nowadays... we all know where most of the forgeries originate.

Conder101 · 03-26-2009, 06:51 PM

I would think it has to be fairly new. As long as I have known the position of the grading services has been to return even obvious counterfeits on the grounds that they do not belong to them.

Cloudsweeper99 · 03-26-2009, 06:59 PM

I would think that permitting the TPG to steal the property of a submitter would expose them to some sort of legal liability. I don't think it is illegal to own a counterfeit coin, and many are collector's items.

One more reason not to use ANACS.

**Harryj** · 03-26-2009, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cloudsweeper99

I don't think it is illegal to own a counterfeit coin, and many are collector's items.

One more reason not to use ANACS.

Possession with fradulent intent

http://www.bep.treas.gov/document.cfm/18/103

HandsomeToad · 03-26-2009, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cloudsweeper99

I would think that permitting the TPG to steal the property of a submitter would expose them to some sort of legal liability. I don't think it is illegal to own a counterfeit coin, and many are collector's items.

One more reason not to use ANACS.

I think what they should do is have a COPY stamp and stamp it, then return it. With it being stamped, it complies with the HPA and no laws are being broken and the submitter gets their coin back and it's HPA compliant.

As to not using ANACS because they are taking fraudulent coins off the streets, I do not concur. I'll leave it at that since I don't feel like arguing tonight.

Ribbit

Conder101 · 03-29-2009, 01:11 AM

Sorry, I don't feel comfortable with them confiscating material that does not belong to them or with mutilating property that doesn't belong to them either. And if the counterfeits are older they do not have to be marked COPY to be compliant with the HPA. If they want to inform the Secret Service about the coin that might be OK but they should be returned to their owners unmolested.

Hobo · 03-29-2009, 01:55 AM

I understand Toad's concern but I'm with Conder on this one.

Nocents · 03-30-2009, 03:41 PM

Good idea

ML94539 · 03-30-2009, 03:47 PM

Interesting. I found some people selling PCGS not genuine 1909S VDB (not cheap for fake) on ebay

Item number: 250398535508

Item number: 270365915109

HandsomeToad · 03-30-2009, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conder101

Sorry, I don't feel comfortable with them confiscating material that does not belong to them or with mutilating property that doesn't belong to them either. And if the counterfeits are older they do not have to be marked COPY to be compliant with the HPA. If they want to inform the Secret Service about the coin that might be OK but they should be returned to their owners unmolested.

Why is someone sending in an old counterfeit to have it authenticated?

Why? Most likely because someone peddled it to them as authentic and for an authentic price. With the way ANACS is doing it, the person who got swindled gets their money back from the scammer (mostly Ebay scammers) and the counterfeit is taken off the streets.

Maybe you all aren't "dumb" enough to be taken by the scammers but I see hundreds get taken every week, so I applaud ANACS for going the extra mile and helping to remove the numistrash off the streets that has been hurting our hobby and by forcing the sellers to reimburse the buyers, it teaches them not to do it again, for fear of losing even more money.

Ribbit

Ps: What if they single out Chinese sellers only? Would that make you happy? But what about the Americans that are buying the Chinese garbage, as replicas, then peddle them as authentic? I guess you'd rather the sucker who bought it, learn from their mistake by losing several thousand dollars, than to have ANACS help them retrieve their hard earned money.

I am not one that supports stamping COPY on counterfeits but if they are sent in for authenticating, then fraud is a FACT and that lil boogher needs to get stamped and it will never be used fraudulently again!

Andrew67 · 03-30-2009, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HandsomeToad

Ps: What if they single out Chinese sellers only? Would that make you happy? But what about the Americans that are buying the Chinese garbage, as replicas, then peddle them as authentic? I guess you'd rather the sucker who bought it, learn from their mistake by losing several thousand dollars, than to have ANACS help them retrieve their hard earned money.

I am not one that supports stamping COPY on counterfeits but if they are sent in for authenticating, then fraud is a FACT and that lil boogher needs to get stamped and it will never be used fraudulently again!

Amen

quartertapper · 03-30-2009, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HandsomeToad

Why is someone sending in an old counterfeit to have it authenticated?

Why? Most likely because someone peddled it to them as authentic and for an authentic price. With the way ANACS is doing it, the person who got swindled gets their money back from the scammer (mostly Ebay scammers) and the counterfeit is taken off the streets.

Maybe you all aren't "dumb" enough to be taken by the scammers but I see hundreds get taken every week, so I applaud ANACS for going the extra mile and helping to remove the numistrash off the streets that has been hurting our hobby and by forcing the sellers to reimburse the buyers, it teaches them not to do it again, for fear of losing even more money.

Ribbit

Ps: What if they single out Chinese sellers only? Would that make you happy? But what about the Americans that are buying the Chinese garbage, as replicas, then peddle them as authentic? I guess you'd rather the sucker who bought it, learn from their mistake by losing several thousand dollars, than to have ANACS help them retrieve their hard earned money.

I am not one that supports stamping COPY on counterfeits but if they are sent in for authenticating, then fraud is a FACT and that lil boogher needs to get stamped and it will never be used fraudulently again!

I am in total agreement. If ANACS is actually doing something to nail these counterfeiters or their venders, that is more than the FBI is currently doing on their own. The counterfeits are getting so good these days, we should be doing whatever possible to punish the profiteers ruining our hobby.

Welcome to Coin Talk! Register Now, it's easy and FREE!