 | |
01-10-2009, 02:15 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | aspiring numismatist
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North Edwards, CA
Posts: 1,123
My Mood: | Grade the walker
Hey guys. I bought this about a year ago as an AU-50 raw from a coin shop for my type set. Looking at it closer, I think it may go higher than that. I don't know much about this series. It is extremely lustrous throughout. Opinions?
|
| |
01-10-2009, 03:13 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Supporter**
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,356
|
Hard to say for sure, but I'm still going with AU.
I'd give it AU-58, though.
|
| |
01-15-2009, 03:28 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 220
|
I'd also say AU-55 or 58. Definitely a nice buy.
|
| |
01-10-2009, 03:38 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | I'M LEGEND
Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Republic Of India
Posts: 1,751
My Mood: |
My grade MS-62
|
| |
01-10-2009, 07:25 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Registry fever
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,011
My Mood: |
I hate grading these.. But I'll say MS 63?
__________________ Shawn
Canadian Small cents : 108/124 87% complete Canadian Large cents: 44/56 78% complete Canadian Small cents MS: 64/124 51.7% complete W.I.N.S# 743
ENS Club Member |
| |
01-10-2009, 08:56 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | 50 Years and Still At It
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,588
My Mood: |
The coin looks well struck.
- Flag lines across the left leg are VERY close to full.
- The left thumb is visible.
- Very close to full head.
Not obviously cleaned; could be original surfaces.
Can't see any obvious rubbing.
I'd say better than AU-50. How much better? I'll let the pros make that decision.
__________________ ANA Member APS Member ARA Member There are 10 types of people: those that understand binary, and those that don't. |
| |
01-10-2009, 09:26 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Goldpan Man
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Alabama
Posts: 223
My Mood: |
I would have to go with AU-58, it looks like it might be some slight wear on Liberty's head, but it's a beautiful coin.
__________________ Attitude is a choice...good or bad. |
| |
01-10-2009, 10:10 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 419
My Mood: |
Its hard to tell, but is there slight wear on the left hand/arm?
ide say AU-58
|
| |
01-10-2009, 10:19 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | What Goes Around Comes A
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,447
My Mood: |
Au-58 Nice Walker . Slight wear on Libertys breast .
rzage
__________________
Instant Karmas gonna
Get you:John Lennon
ANA member
#R3146234
|
| |
01-10-2009, 10:19 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | US Coin Collector
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,393
My Mood: |
I would say AU-55 to AU-58. Like Josh said, there is wear on the left arm. Also, some other high points have been slightly worn down such as the breast, legs, feathers, etc... Nice coin though |
| |
01-10-2009, 10:33 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 230
|
Can you guys help me to understand how grading services determine whether coins are circulated versus uncirculated? Whenever I see coins that are AU-50 to AU-58, I cannot really tell if they are circulated.
More importantly, if a coin is listed as uncirculated, I cannot really tell if it has never been circulated. I would love to learn how to tell the difference.
|
| |
01-10-2009, 10:38 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | What Goes Around Comes A
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,447
My Mood: | Quote:
Originally Posted by coinblogger Can you guys help me to understand how grading services determine whether coins are circulated versus uncirculated? Whenever I see coins that are AU-50 to AU-58, I cannot really tell if they are circulated.
More importantly, if a coin is listed as uncirculated, I cannot really tell if it has never been circulated. I would love to learn how to tell the difference. | Look for slight changes in the color or luster on the coins high spot on this walker look at her left breast you can see a slight color change this is wear .
rzage
__________________
Instant Karmas gonna
Get you:John Lennon
ANA member
#R3146234
|
| |
01-10-2009, 11:39 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Coin Collector
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,387
|
To be honest the lighting and the color of the image make it tough to tell much about breaks in luster. It has the look of AU-50.
__________________
Larry
|
| |
01-10-2009, 11:49 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | What Goes Around Comes A
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,447
My Mood: | Quote:
Originally Posted by ldhair To be honest the lighting and the color of the image make it tough to tell much about breaks in luster. It has the look of AU-50. | Even in these pictures you can see the change in color on her left breast , at least that's what it looks like to me .
rzage 
__________________
Instant Karmas gonna
Get you:John Lennon
ANA member
#R3146234
|
| |
01-11-2009, 03:05 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | aspiring numismatist
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North Edwards, CA
Posts: 1,123
My Mood: |
I see no luster breaks nor color changes other than a touch of rub on her breast and some lack of details. The reverse looks totally clean and fully lustrous. Personally, I was thinking AU-58.
|
| |  | | Would you like to support CoinTalk?
Coin Talk Code of Honor
1. Post unto others as you would have them post unto you.
2. Keep it clean, like a 1950s family television show.
3. If you don't like the coin, don't trash the person. | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Hybrid Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Newsletter | » Sponsors | | » Recent Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » Today's Top Posters | | Top Posters in Last 1 Days | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |