CoinSwede

I won an auction where the title was "2000 US MINT PROOF SET + PROOF STATE QUARTER SET" and the item listing says "THIS AUCTION IS FOR THE US MINT 2000 PROOF STATE QUARTER SET AND US MINT 2000 PROOF SET".

According to me, I should be getting the 2000 clad proof state quarter set (5 coins) and the 2000 clad proof set (10 coins), but the seller only sent the 10 coin set. When I sent a question to him about this, his reply was 'that is what the auction was for....the 2000 us mint proof set which included the 5 state quarter set. I don't understand what you are asking? There should have been only 10 coins.'

My reply was: 'The auction description says "THIS AUCTION IS FOR THE US MINT 2000 PROOF STATE QUARTER SET AND US MINT 2000 PROOF SET"
That means there should be two sets, one 2000 proof set containing 10 coins, and one 2000 state quarter proof set containing the 5 quarters.'

Am I right in my assumption that I should get both sets?

cholmes75

Yes you are right.

collect4fun

If it was a PROOF set then there would only be 5 coins ( S mint mark ) plus the 5 quarters. If it were a MINT set then there would be 10 coins (both P & D mint marks ) plus the 5 quarters.

Was a picture posted for this auction? It does get confusing when the auction states Mint Proof sets, which is it, a Mint set or a Proof set?

__________________
WINS # 534
MSNS #9969

It is every man's obligation to put back into the world at least the equivalent of what he takes out of it. --Albert Einstein

CoinSwede

The 2000 clad proof set contains 10 coins, including the 5 quarters (see description at http://www.us-proof-sets.com/1999-date.htm).
By reading the auction description I was expecting to get one of those sets plus the 2000 State Quarter clad proof set (http://www.us-proof-sets.com/1999-date-quarter.htm)


The auction was for a 2000 proof set and a 2000 quarters proof set. The word "Mint" was used to describe that the coins come from the U.S. Mint, not that the items up for bid were mint sets.
No pictures...

collect4fun

This is a good example why I will never bid on an auction that does not have pictures. I always compare the description, Title, picture and if they do not match, I do not bid.

I also agree that this seller was not trying to cheat or lie, just worded things wrong.

__________________
WINS # 534
MSNS #9969

It is every man's obligation to put back into the world at least the equivalent of what he takes out of it. --Albert Einstein

satootoko

It really sounds like you read the seller's plus sign as "and", when he/she meant "including". My guess is that he/she graduated from high school since proper command of the English language was dropped as a graduation requirement.

__________________
Roy

greyfang

Yes the way it reads is a bit ambiguous, but I can see a non-coin-collector type and/or a careless person describing it that way without actually trying to deceive anybody. It stills stinks to feel like you overpaid though. Maybe they will let you return it since your interpretation is reasonable enough.

CoinSwede

That may be what he meant, but that's not what he wrote...
To me, the text "THIS AUCTION IS FOR THE US MINT 2000 PROOF STATE QUARTER SET AND US MINT 2000 PROOF SET" clearly indicates that there are two separate sets included in the auction.

greyfang

Agreed. You're preaching to the choir man! LoL. I just got burned by an out-and-out hustler, so don't feel like your alone. I learned my lesson the hard way for the bargain price of ~$70, so I consider myself lucky. It could have been worse. Now I am much more selective about sellers and always collect all the facts/clarification before bidding. Sometimes I miss out on bidding because the seller has plenty of bidders but doesn't want to spend extra time on me, but hey, I'm not going to get screwed any more either.

Best Regards

susanlynn9

It probably was an honest mistake on the part of the seller. Probably not even meant to mislead. I swear that many sellers don't even read over their auctions to see how the wording could be interpreted (and to check for typos.) Does the seller seem willing to negotiate at all? Is it worth it to you to return the set if it is for a full refund (including shipping)?

__________________
Susan
WINS#482
FLY-IN#1474
EAC#5255
CONECA#N-3902
Education....the key to collector success!

CoinSwede

Just received this:

"After reviewing how my auction read and comparing it to other auctions currently listed, i really don't the problem. the auction was for the 2000 us mint proof set.....which consists of 5 coins plus the set of the 5 quarters released that year. I am sorry if you thought there was 2 seperate sets of coins but you should have asked if before the auction ended if you were unsure as to the contents. plus the price alone should have made it clear. If it would have been two sets of quarters and the regular mint set ...the price would have been higher. I really am sorry you feel disappointed or cheated. You are welcome to send them back to me at your cost and I will refund your purchase price once I receive the coins."

My reply: "Both the 2000 quarter proof set (5 quarters) and the 2000 proof sets (10 coin set, including 5 quarters) are sets that were sold by the US Mint. Your auction description mentions both sets, so why shouldn't the two sets be included in the auction?

The sets can be bought from dealers like Paul Sims for about $40 (incl. shipping) for both sets, so my bid for $34 (incl. shipping) is a fair bid for both sets and I had no reason to believe that my bid was for only one set.

Sure I can send the sets back for a refund, but I expect to get my shipping cost refunded too. Why should I have to lose money because your auction listed two sets but only one set was actually offered for sale?"

collect4fun

I think this all comes down to semantics. What defines a set? Is all 5 quarters a set and are the 5 "other" coins a set? Or is a set the 5 quarters and the other set the 5 quarters and the "other" 5 coins a set?

I can see where you are coming from CoinSwede and if I were the seller I would refund the purchase price, but not the shipping costs. Misunderunderstandings occur, but there is always a cost of education.

__________________
WINS # 534
MSNS #9969

It is every man's obligation to put back into the world at least the equivalent of what he takes out of it. --Albert Einstein

CoinSwede

In this case I would define a set based on the US Mint's definition of sets: A 2000 proof set is supposed to contain the 5 quarters and the 5 "other" coins. A 2000 quarter proof set is supposed to contain 5 quarters. If a seller lists both a proof set and a quarter proof set, I expect to receive both complete sets (15 coins total), not half a proof set (no quarters) plus a quarter proof set.

I agree that the issue is a misunderstanding caused by an unclear auction listing, but I can't really see why I should bear any cost when the seller was unclear.
paying for my shipping would be the cost of education for the seller in this case.

My issue is not the money I paid. It's more a question of holding people accountable for their mistakes. Everyone can make a mistake, but I would expect people to assume responsibility for the mistakes they make.

collect4fun

I am not taking one side or the other nor am I trying to offend anyone here, but I will quote you " ... I would expect people to assume responsibility for the mistakes they make." As my post above states "This is a good example why I will never bid on an auction that does not have pictures. I always compare the description, Title, picture and if they do not match, I do not bid." Maybe both the buyer and seller each made a mistake.

The only reason I am saying this is I am both a buyer ond seller on ebay, so I can see both sides.

__________________
WINS # 534
MSNS #9969

It is every man's obligation to put back into the world at least the equivalent of what he takes out of it. --Albert Einstein

CoinSwede

Yeah, I guess my mistake was that I expected the seller to know what he was selling. When he listed two sets, I should have known that he only meant one set...

(I realize that I could have been more careful when choosing which auctions to bid on, but I generally expect the seller to know what he's selling.)