A Lincoln cent?
Larry
Wheatback as well.
kinda, no really dumb IMO.
But difficult to read the date or assign a grade from that photo. Could you crop it a little better?
Jim
Originally Posted by coinhound kinda, no really dumb IMO. You know what? Don't comment then. I see posts all the time and don't feel the need to be negative. Chris
Pardon me, Mr. Brooklyn, I took the liberty of cropping the picture for you. And then I decided to enlarge it for you. It looks authentic to me. Let's let the experts decide for sure.
You can now clarily see it is a 1952 D VG45 cent. Not as old as the clock on the left which dates to 1937. Thanks Caz
Originally Posted by mrbrklyn Not as old as the clock on the left which dates to 1937. Thanks Caz .......and the modern clock on the right has the wrong time. Chris
I see you went to photo media class and learned the center of balance focus thing.
Originally Posted by cpm9ball .......and the modern clock on the right has the wrong time. Chris Well one of them does
Originally Posted by StandingPride95 I see you went to photo media class and learned the center of balance focus thing. 100% incorrect. I just liked the symbolism of the seripidus image and took the picture with manual focus. don't ask me to spell seridipidus.
Originally Posted by mrbrklyn 100% incorrect. I just liked the symbolism of the seripidus image and took the picture with manual focus. don't ask me to spell seridipidus. serendipitous.......s-e-r-e-n-d-i-p-i-t-o-u-s.......serendipitous!
diplodocus...diplodocus...diplodocus...diplodocus. ..diplodocus...diplodocus...diplodocus d-i-p-l-o-d-o-c-u-s
Originally Posted by mrbrklyn diplodocus...diplodocus...diplodocus...diplodocus. ..diplodocus...diplodocus...diplodocus d-i-p-l-o-d-o-c-u-s v-o-l-c-a-n-o....e-r-u-p-t-s....b-o-o-m....n-o....m-o-r-e....d-i-p-l-o-d-o-c-u-s
Forum Rules
Supporters get more features and less ads! Click here to sign up!
Bookmarks