Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: Is this 1914-D legitimate?

  1. #31
    Newbieus Sempiterna BooksB4Coins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Novi Eboraci
    Posts
    1,586
    Liked
    596 times
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by kookoox10 Click here to enlarge
    The second "1" looks to be a ground down 4. As in this was a 1944-D. Common way to counterfeit this key.
    A 1944-D with metal removed from the second 4 is an alteration, not counterfeit, as the coin is still genuine. While I get the point you were trying to make, and even though the end result is basically the same, a distinction should be made between the two.

  2. #32
    Member d.t.menace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    1,962
    Liked
    444 times
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by kookoox10 Click here to enlarge
    The second "1" looks to be a ground down 4. As in this was a 1944-D. Common way to counterfeit this key.
    +1
    Also you can't compare one 44D mintmark location and use it to say it isn't a '44. There was more than one obverse die used and each one has a different MM location.
    On the 14D the 9 should be centered between the ones, on your coin it isn't.

  3. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Spokane Wa
    Posts
    47
    Liked
    19 times
    Yea kook, I do agree with that and am familiar with that type of CF of this coin, the thing that I dont understand is how the distance between the 9 the 2nd 1 and the 4 match up with a 1914 and not a 1944, thats the thing thats NOT counterfeit able. On a 1944 the two 4's and the right side of the 9 are all equal distance apart, on the 1914 the distance between the 1 and the 4 lines up with the center of the 9.

    Thanks though, I do appreciate that!

  4. #34
    ANA #3168546 kookoox10's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Fremont, CA
    Posts
    3,154
    Liked
    1138 times
    Gee thanks guys, alteration is what I really meant. My mind is running faster than my typing this morning Click here to enlarge

  5. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Spokane Wa
    Posts
    47
    Liked
    19 times
    Thanks Menace, that is the one thing I didnt look at, I was looking at the distances between the 9 4 4 and 9 1 4. BUt yes now it jumps out at me, Im still puzzled at the fact that the 9 1 4 have correct placement, but now I am satisfied its a faker!

    mlgdave

  6. #36
    The Village Idiot mikenoodle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    6,273
    Liked
    447 times
    One tool for determining a 1944 from a 1914 is to look at the bottom of Lincoln's bust. A 1914 will have a smooth truncation (bottom), whereas the 44 will exhibit a small VDB on the bottom edge. It was put there in 1918 and all coins minted from 1909-1917 can be determined by the lack of these letters on the bust
    A life is not important except for the impact it has on other lives. - Jackie Robinson
    -----------------------------------------------------

    You can listen to "The Coin Show" on the embedded player on this page! Just click and listen! Or download our show either through the player, on iTunes, or on our website - www.coinshowradio.com

  7. #37
    Numismatist rlm's cents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    14,452
    Liked
    1533 times
    My Mood
    Persnickety
    As best I can figure, that is a 1914 Lincoln. I am at least 95% sure that date has NOT been modified. However, as Morgandude11 suggested, I have my doubts about that mint mark, although I won't go as far as he went
    Slow down, you move too fast.
    You got to make the morning last.
    Just kicking down the cobble stones.
    Looking for fun and feelin' groovy.

  8. #38
    Numismatist rlm's cents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    14,452
    Liked
    1533 times
    My Mood
    Persnickety
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by mikenoodle Click here to enlarge
    One tool for determining a 1944 from a 1914 is to look at the bottom of Lincoln's bust. A 1914 will have a smooth truncation (bottom), whereas the 44 will exhibit a small VDB on the bottom edge. It was put there in 1918 and all coins minted from 1909-1917 can be determined by the lack of these letters on the bust
    Sort of. The presents of a VDB will definitely indicate a 1944 Lincoln. However, these capable of modifying the date so it looks proper and also capable of modifying (removing) the VDB.

    And, FWIW, I do not see it on that coin and at least some of it should be visible.
    Last edited by rlm's cents; 08-09-2012 at 02:39 PM.
    Slow down, you move too fast.
    You got to make the morning last.
    Just kicking down the cobble stones.
    Looking for fun and feelin' groovy.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-03-2012, 10:22 AM
  2. legitimate dealer
    By benne911 in forum Coin Chat
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-29-2012, 01:35 PM
  3. Is this a legitimate error?
    By BRandM in forum Paper Money
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-07-2011, 08:47 AM
  4. Is this a legitimate complaint?
    By zaneman in forum US Coins Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 11-06-2005, 07:39 PM
  5. UK Euro Patterns Legitimate?
    By JG in forum World & Ancient Coins
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-12-2003, 05:58 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •