By mrbrklyn. Where do you draw the line between spurring discussion and spamming the forum with crap?
Let's take a deeper look... a total of 1143 replies in those 111 threads... that's 10.29 replies per thread. Let's say a good discussion goes 50 posts... how many of those 111 threads have 50+ posts? 5.
Something is amiss... let's throw out the 4 biggest threads and the 4 smallest threads!
The four biggest would have 135, 133, 86 and 78 replies, for a total of 432 replies.
The four smallest have zero.
Subtract 432 from 1143, and we have 711 replies over 103 threads... Adjusted average of 6.9 replies per thread.
Further, how many of his threads in this timespan have 4 or less replies? Anybody want to guess? 60 of them! That's 54% of his started threads in the past 9 days that are pretty much irrelevant and just cluttering up the place.
I understand some people don't have a filter between their brains and their mouths/keyboard and mouse, but this is a bit more exacerbated than that.