A couple of baby coppers on their way to me:
![]()
A couple of baby coppers on their way to me:
![]()
Nice Injuns!
New opinions are always suspected and usually opposed, for no other reason than because they are not already common. – John Locke
One more bump before letting this old copper thread fade...
An 1793 wreath cent, variety S-9, Rarity-2. Commonest of the wreath cents. A bit grainy but nice.
An 1798/7, variety S-151. R-3. Much better surfaces and color than the pictures.
And the last two:
1796 Draped Bust, variety S-97 (If I recall correctly)
1794 Flowing Hair. Some rim bumps visible on both sides, but still nice. The pictures do not do it justice.
Eduard - I never realized till now just how many profile/face changes they made to those early 179X cents - quite a few changes in a short time. The one on your 1794 above looks more like a man's profile than a woman's.
New opinions are always suspected and usually opposed, for no other reason than because they are not already common. – John Locke
Here's one from old Eagle Eye (via the Ray Douglas collection). Graded 65RB by PCGS but darned close to 66RD.
Lance.
![]()
That Eagle Eye confirmation from Rick Snow is a nice one to have!
New opinions are always suspected and usually opposed, for no other reason than because they are not already common. – John Locke
beef, your coin is like mine (minus the rim bumps). Nice!
You know, you are right. You can't really say it is definitely a female bust on the cents 1793-1796. Even when looking at the many die varieties. They are more aesthetic than the portrait on the chain cents, though! By contrast, I consider that the portrait on the draped bust types minted 1796-1807 look more feminine.
BTW, i have the same opinion of the Barber types - difficult to say whether male or female - rather androgynous in my opinion.
I've always loved this one
![]()
Bookmarks