 |
05-14-2006, 03:31 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: deep in Kentucky
Posts: 227
| a thin nickle... help please
Here is a small nickle
It's a 1962, it has a different color, more of a flat slate gray, kind of like a war nickle would have.
It's a little smaller in size, (as in not as big around) and it is a lot thinner.
The weight on my scale is 4.7 as in a reg. nickle is 5.1 ( it said in the red book it should be 5.0 but my scales says it's 5.1)
I have pictures that show it pretty well.. Would someone please tell me if this is an error, and if not..what is it?
Thanks...
__________________ cho cho |
| |
05-14-2006, 06:30 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Somewhere
Posts: 222
| I'm not an error expert, but the obverse looks worn. I don't know how likely it is for the actual coin to be worn down. Sorry I can't help.
__________________ Although I am not naturally honest, I sometimes am by chance. |
| |
05-14-2006, 08:29 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: deep in Kentucky
Posts: 227
|
Im not sure what it is..but I don't think it's smaller because it's worn.. I have them much older and worn much more, and still their size is the same.. but thanks so much for looking... have a Great Day..
__________________ cho cho |
| |
05-14-2006, 08:57 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Numismatist
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Fairfax,VA
Posts: 2,321
|
Simple wear wouldn't account for that much thickness and weight difference but I can't tell you what would.Very interesting!Any opinions??
|
| |
05-14-2006, 09:25 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19
|
Can you show us the edge of normal and this one to compare thickness? While the coin is worn, doesn't look worn enough to be considerably thinner. Wonder about wrong planchet? It also has a lot more wear than a nickel coin of that age, I think. Wrong metal?
|
| |
05-14-2006, 09:35 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Numismatist
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Fairfax,VA
Posts: 2,321
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by CoinGremlin Can you show us the edge of normal and this one to compare thickness? While the coin is worn, doesn't look worn enough to be considerably thinner. Wonder about wrong planchet? It also has a lot more wear than a nickel coin of that age, I think. Wrong metal? | CG...I think he already has.The thicker one in his pics is a 1970.
|
| |
05-14-2006, 09:53 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19
|
OK. Well it's almost 9 here, and I hadn't done anything stoopid yet, so there you are. LOL
Gosh, I really wonder about wrong planchet, but I am no expert.
|
| |
05-14-2006, 11:06 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: deep in Kentucky
Posts: 227
|
Hi guys.. just come by to check, thanks for all your opinions. well it looks to be a different metal.. it's dark.. not the silver color of other nickels.
Well I'll be back later.. maybe someone will see it and say..hey..I know what that is.. grins..
Thanks Everyone for looking...
__________________ cho cho |
| |
05-14-2006, 11:58 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | 73 Buick Riviera owner
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Girard PA
Posts: 1,052
My Mood: |
It is only missing .3 in weight, so I don't think it's a dime planchet, although it seems to be the right color for silver. Possibly a different silver planchet? More educated error enthusiasts will post soon.
|
| |
05-15-2006, 12:15 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Coin Collector
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,203
|
It looks like both faces have been buffed down. It's not natural wear and it's not a weak strike. The convex edge and abnormally small diameter are definitely signs of post-strike alteration. Conclusion: Not an error.
|
| |
05-15-2006, 12:18 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5
|
it almost looks like it got stamped one too many times, also, does it look any bigger diameter-wise?
|
| |
05-15-2006, 01:57 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: deep in Kentucky
Posts: 227
|
why the different color?
__________________ cho cho |
| |
05-17-2006, 09:43 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 98
|
I agree with Mike. I have a similar nickel that was likely altered with some sort of acidic concoction and it displays similarities to your coin.
|
| |
05-18-2006, 01:08 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 91
|
Do you have a caliper? Measure it and the reg coin, could be an illusion with the rounded edges.....Just my .02
|
| |
05-18-2006, 02:49 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 305
|
It looks pitted to me, like it was sand, bead blasted or maybe put in an industrial part tumbler.
|
| |  | Would you like to support CoinTalk?
Coin Talk Code of Honor
1. Post unto others as you would have them post unto you.
2. Keep it clean, like a 1950s family television show.
3. If you don't like the coin, don't trash the person. | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Hybrid Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Newsletter | » Sponsors | | » Recent Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » Today's Top Posters | | Top Posters in Last 1 Days | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |