CoinTalk

Welcome to Coin Talk! Register Now, it's easy and FREE!

Thousands of coin collectors, numismatists, coin dealers, bullion investors, and enthusiasts make Coin Talk their number one source for numismatic news, information about US and world coins, discussions and community.

You are currently viewing Coin Talk as a guest, which limits your access to content, contests and information. By joining our free community, you will be able to join in discussions, contact other members, place free advertisements, enter contests, and much more. Registration is easy and free. Register Now


Go Back   CoinTalk > Coin Forums > Error Coins

Notices

Error Coins Discuss error coins at Cointalk.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-14-2006, 03:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
chocho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: deep in Kentucky
Posts: 227
Question a thin nickle... help please

Here is a small nickle
It's a 1962, it has a different color, more of a flat slate gray, kind of like a war nickle would have.
It's a little smaller in size, (as in not as big around) and it is a lot thinner.
The weight on my scale is 4.7 as in a reg. nickle is 5.1 ( it said in the red book it should be 5.0 but my scales says it's 5.1)
I have pictures that show it pretty well.. Would someone please tell me if this is an error, and if not..what is it?
Thanks...
Attached Thumbnails
1.jpg  

2.jpg  

3.jpg  

4.jpg  

__________________
cho cho
chocho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2006, 06:30 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
CoinKid52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 222
I'm not an error expert, but the obverse looks worn. I don't know how likely it is for the actual coin to be worn down. Sorry I can't help.
__________________
Although I am not naturally honest, I sometimes am by chance.
CoinKid52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2006, 08:29 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
chocho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: deep in Kentucky
Posts: 227
Im not sure what it is..but I don't think it's smaller because it's worn.. I have them much older and worn much more, and still their size is the same.. but thanks so much for looking... have a Great Day..
__________________
cho cho
chocho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2006, 08:57 PM   #4 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
Mikjo0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fairfax,VA
Posts: 2,321
Simple wear wouldn't account for that much thickness and weight difference but I can't tell you what would.Very interesting!Any opinions??
Mikjo0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2006, 09:25 PM   #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
CoinGremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19
Can you show us the edge of normal and this one to compare thickness? While the coin is worn, doesn't look worn enough to be considerably thinner. Wonder about wrong planchet? It also has a lot more wear than a nickel coin of that age, I think. Wrong metal?
CoinGremlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2006, 09:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
Mikjo0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fairfax,VA
Posts: 2,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoinGremlin
Can you show us the edge of normal and this one to compare thickness? While the coin is worn, doesn't look worn enough to be considerably thinner. Wonder about wrong planchet? It also has a lot more wear than a nickel coin of that age, I think. Wrong metal?
CG...I think he already has.The thicker one in his pics is a 1970.
Mikjo0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2006, 09:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
CoinGremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19
OK. Well it's almost 9 here, and I hadn't done anything stoopid yet, so there you are. LOL
Gosh, I really wonder about wrong planchet, but I am no expert.
CoinGremlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2006, 11:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
chocho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: deep in Kentucky
Posts: 227
Hi guys.. just come by to check, thanks for all your opinions. well it looks to be a different metal.. it's dark.. not the silver color of other nickels.
Well I'll be back later.. maybe someone will see it and say..hey..I know what that is.. grins..
Thanks Everyone for looking...
__________________
cho cho
chocho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2006, 11:58 PM   #9 (permalink)
73 Buick Riviera owner
 
Captainkirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Girard PA
Posts: 1,052
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 1
It is only missing .3 in weight, so I don't think it's a dime planchet, although it seems to be the right color for silver. Possibly a different silver planchet? More educated error enthusiasts will post soon.
Captainkirk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 12:15 AM   #10 (permalink)
Coin Collector
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,203
It looks like both faces have been buffed down. It's not natural wear and it's not a weak strike. The convex edge and abnormally small diameter are definitely signs of post-strike alteration. Conclusion: Not an error.
mikediamond is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 12:18 AM   #11 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5
it almost looks like it got stamped one too many times, also, does it look any bigger diameter-wise?
mwmx54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 01:57 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
chocho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: deep in Kentucky
Posts: 227
why the different color?
__________________
cho cho
chocho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2006, 09:43 PM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 98
I agree with Mike. I have a similar nickel that was likely altered with some sort of acidic concoction and it displays similarities to your coin.
Gusmyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 01:08 PM   #14 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 91
Do you have a caliper? Measure it and the reg coin, could be an illusion with the rounded edges.....Just my .02
__________________
Love them busts!
Best Prices for Coins
jmpearso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2006, 02:49 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
happycobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 305
It looks pitted to me, like it was sand, bead blasted or maybe put in an industrial part tumbler.
happycobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Would you like to support CoinTalk?

Coin Talk Code of Honor
1. Post unto others as you would have them post unto you.
2. Keep it clean, like a 1950s family television show.
3. If you don't like the coin, don't trash the person.

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


» Newsletter
Sign up for CoinTalk's Newsletter
enter your email address below.
» Unanswered Posts
Do You Have the Answer?
» Sponsors

» Today's Top Posters
Top Posters in Last 1 Days
[25]
[20]
[13]
[13]
[13]
[12]
[12]
[11]
[10]
[10]

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 AM.


vBAdvertise v1.0.0 Copyright ©2009, PixelFX Studios
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright 2008 CoinTalk
"Wiki" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.0.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.