CoinTalk

Welcome to Coin Talk! Register Now, it's easy and FREE!

Thousands of coin collectors, numismatists, coin dealers, bullion investors, and enthusiasts make Coin Talk their number one source for numismatic news, information about US and world coins, discussions and community.

You are currently viewing Coin Talk as a guest, which limits your access to content, contests and information. By joining our free community, you will be able to join in discussions, contact other members, place free advertisements, enter contests, and much more. Registration is easy and free. Register Now


Go Back   CoinTalk

Notices

View Single Post
Old 07-03-2009, 12:33 PM   #26 (permalink)
raider34
Morgans Morgans Morgans
 
raider34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 3,028
My Mood:
Send a message via AIM to raider34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Feld View Post
Thanks. As much as I appreciate how the same coin can look vastly different based on two sets of images, I still thought that was two different coins. I saw spots, stains and marks apparent in one set of images that I didn't see in the other, and didn't see any obvious common markers. Of course that begs the question - which set of images, if either, does the coin really look like?
I agree, from the first pics imo it looked like NT, but from the second set it looks AT. I circled some areas on the reverse that imo show signs of wear.
Attached Thumbnails
untitled.jpg  

raider34 is online now   Reply With Quote
 
» Newsletter
Sign up for CoinTalk's Newsletter
enter your email address below.
» Unanswered Posts
Do You Have the Answer?
» Sponsors

» Today's Top Posters
Top Posters in Last 1 Days
[38]
[32]
[25]
[24]
[19]
[18]
[16]
[15]
[14]
[14]

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 PM.


vBAdvertise v1.0.0 Copyright ©2009, PixelFX Studios
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright 2008 CoinTalk
"Wiki" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.0.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.