CoinTalk

Welcome to Coin Talk! Register Now, it's easy and FREE!

Thousands of coin collectors, numismatists, coin dealers, bullion investors, and enthusiasts make Coin Talk their number one source for numismatic news, information about US and world coins, discussions and community.

You are currently viewing Coin Talk as a guest, which limits your access to content, contests and information. By joining our free community, you will be able to join in discussions, contact other members, place free advertisements, enter contests, and much more. Registration is easy and free. Register Now


Go Back   CoinTalk

Notices

View Single Post
Old 06-14-2009, 01:54 AM   #12 (permalink)
tmoneyeagles
Indian Buffalo Gatherer
 
tmoneyeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 6,392
My Mood:
Camaro,

You can see a strike difference in my 83 and 84 O minted morgans...
One is a little stronger than the other, that being the 84 O

1883-o-ngc-ms63.jpg

1884-o-ngc-ms63.jpg

This was a great post, and you have taught me a great deal about morgans, in private conversations, and on the forums
You are a great teacher, and this post only proves it
The "O" minted new orleans dollars, are not all weakly struck, but speaking for the majority, yes, they are a weakly struck coin, the CC and S minted coins, have stronger strikes, GENERALLY speaking, I'm not saying every CC will have better breast feathers than every O, but speaking generally, and looking at it, from a wider standpoint, yes the O is the weakest struck, and CC and S are strongest. But yes, there are some years, in which finding a well struck piece can be easier than others, just today, my last day of my trip in fredericksburg Texas, I found an 1882 O morgan I wanted, it was MS63 NGC, but I decided not to get it, not just because of the price ($58, with some toning, so not all that bad) but because the strike was fairly weak, and from one angle scratches look weird, almost like the coin had taken a bath in something! lol But my main point was on that coin, it looked soft, almost like wear, but no wear on the coin, and I agreed with NGC's grade, but it was not getting bang for my buck, that is for sure

Great Post!
__________________
From The Desk Of, -T$ (Kokapowan Tribe Leader)

http://www.tmoneyeagles.webs.com/
tmoneyeagles is offline   Reply With Quote
 
» Newsletter
Sign up for CoinTalk's Newsletter
enter your email address below.
» Unanswered Posts
Do You Have the Answer?
» Sponsors

» Today's Top Posters
Top Posters in Last 1 Days
[40]
[26]
[25]
[18]
[15]
[15]
[15]
[14]
[13]
[11]

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 AM.


vBAdvertise v1.0.0 Copyright ©2009, PixelFX Studios
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright 2008 CoinTalk
"Wiki" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.0.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.