CoinTalk

Welcome to Coin Talk! Register Now, it's easy and FREE!

Thousands of coin collectors, numismatists, coin dealers, bullion investors, and enthusiasts make Coin Talk their number one source for numismatic news, information about US and world coins, discussions and community.

You are currently viewing Coin Talk as a guest, which limits your access to content, contests and information. By joining our free community, you will be able to join in discussions, contact other members, place free advertisements, enter contests, and much more. Registration is easy and free. Register Now


Go Back   CoinTalk

Notices

View Single Post
Old 09-27-2002, 03:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
kieferscoins
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 21
Quote:
Finally, the grading services are also biased toward provenance. If a rich, well-known collector once owned the coin, they grade it more leniently.
I don't agree with this. Didn't alot of the Benson pedigree coins get resubmitted and many of the coins received one grade higher at the second try without the pedigree histroy. Why didn't NGC overgrade the first time? Bass coins that I have seen have not looked overgraded. Which important collection would fall under this assumption?

Overall, this is the most informative thread ever on this message boards history. Thanks for posting it.

Cameron Kiefer
kieferscoins is offline   Reply With Quote
 
» Newsletter
Sign up for CoinTalk's Newsletter
enter your email address below.
» Unanswered Posts
Do You Have the Answer?
» Sponsors

» Today's Top Posters
Top Posters in Last 1 Days
[30]
[25]
[21]
[21]
[19]
[12]
[11]
[11]
[10]
[10]

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 AM.


vBAdvertise v1.0.0 Copyright ©2009, PixelFX Studios
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright 2008 CoinTalk
"Wiki" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.0.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.