Add me to the list of people the OP does not speak for :thumb:
Liked On: 07-30-2012, 11:58 AM
Remarks like that are really uncalled for. You started this thread in an open forum, open meaning open to any member to comment on.
Liked On: 07-30-2012, 10:40 AM
These were made for the bicentennial celebration. Dual date coins; quarters, halves, and dollars, were wrapped in those wrappers. The coins were struck beginning in 1975, hence why there are no...
Liked On: 07-29-2012, 10:43 PM
Add me to the list of people the OP does not speak for :thumb:
Liked On: 07-29-2012, 04:26 PM
191673191674 191676191677
Liked On: 07-28-2012, 12:19 PM
Gee! I can't imagine why! 191665 191666
Liked On: 07-28-2012, 11:40 AM
191679191680 191681191682
Liked On: 07-28-2012, 11:08 AM
Gee! I can't imagine why! 191665 191666
Liked On: 07-28-2012, 10:55 AM
Those are not genuine U.S. coins. The designs are not even close to the actual ones on U.S. coins.
Liked On: 07-26-2012, 06:08 PM
It would be body bagged for sure. XF DETAILS would be on the label.
Liked On: 07-25-2012, 04:26 PM
I have one set complete 64 and higher on the uncirculated coins, and 64 and higher on proofs. Currently working on a 64FBL set of uncirculated Franklins.
Liked On: 07-25-2012, 10:50 AM
After reading the 5 posts Alex has made, English is his/her second language, and might be going through an online language translator.
Liked On: 07-25-2012, 09:22 AM
191005 I'm thinking of getting a thicker pair!
Liked On: 07-24-2012, 10:21 PM
191005 I'm thinking of getting a thicker pair!
Liked On: 07-24-2012, 07:08 PM
I think before you go after buying coins and deciding on what coins you want to collect, there are a couple of books I would recommend for you to read first: 190963 Great info on coins, price...
Liked On: 07-24-2012, 06:46 PM